MINUTES
STATE
OF NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY
OF HENDERSON JANUARY 10, 2003
The Henderson
County Board of Commissioners met for a special called meeting at 3:00 p.m. in
the Four Season=s Room at the
Quality Inn, Hendersonville, North Carolina.
The purpose of the meeting was a Board Retreat.
Those present
were: Chairman Grady Hawkins,
Vice-Chairman Larry Young, Commissioner Bill Moyer, Commissioner Charlie
Messer, Commissioner Shannon Baldwin,
County Manager David E. Nicholson, County Attorney Angela S. Beeker, and
Clerk to the Board Elizabeth W. Corn.
Also present
were: Planning Director Karen C. Smith, Budget and Management Director Selena
Coffey, Fire Marshal/Emergency Management Coordinator Rocky Hyder; Finance
Director J. Carey McLelland, County Engineer Gary Tweed, and Geoff Willett
(facilitator).
CALL TO
ORDER/WELCOME
Chairman
Hawkins called the meeting to order and welcomed all in attendance. He reviewed
the agenda with the Board, stating that there would be a break for dinner at
6:00 p.m. and we would try to wrap things up about 8:00 p.m. He informed those in attendance that we
would start back promptly at 9:00 a.m. in the morning with some pastries,
biscuits, juice and coffee available about 8:30.
He introduced
Geoff Willett, Division of Community Assistance, who was the facilitator for
the retreat.
INTRODUCTIONS
There were a
couple of people Mr. Willett had not met so we did self introductions.
OVERVIEW
Mr. Willett
informed the Board of two large sheets of paper on the wall for this meeting.
One was labeled Aparking lot@ and items will
be added to it to get back to at a later time.
The second was labeled Ainformation needs@ and items will
be added to it as the need arises.
These lists from the retreat will be added to the end of this set of
minutes.
Mr. Willett
started the meeting by listing three things Commissioners must do:
1.
Hire/fire County Manager as the Chief Executive Officer of the county
(performance review)
2.
Adopt and stick to a Mission Statement
3.
Provide adequate resources to get the work done, fund the programs and
services
The purpose of a
retreat is to get a new perspective and be able to do a better job. Communication is the key.
Review of Mission
Statement
There was
discussion of the Board=s Mission Statement
which was adopted February 18, 1998 (a revision of the original Mission
Statement from 1995). The Board saw the need to revisit the statement and
revise it to suit the current Board of Commissioners. The 1998 Mission Statement was AOur mission is to
lead our community, to promote individual responsibility and equal opportunity,
and to protect one another. While
striving to provide efficient, innovative and quality public services, we will
work to stimulate economic growth and regional cooperation, and to balance the
preservation and utilization of all of our resources.@
Following much
discussion and deliberation, the following mission statement was offered: AOur mission is to
lead our community, to promote individual responsibility and equal opportunity,
to protect life and property, to provide efficient, innovative, and
quality public services; to stimulate
economic growth and regional cooperation and to balance the preservation and
utilization of all of our resources.@
There was much discussion about Aall of our resources@ and it was
decided to leave it as is. There was
discussion of whether this meant our natural resources but it was decided that
it meant not only our natural resources but also our monetary resources and our
human resources (that resources was all-encompassing).
Commissioner
Baldwin made the motion to adopt the revised Mission Statement, as listed
above. All voted in favor and the
motion carried.
Role of
Commissioners
C
Policy makers (policy set has to support the mission
statement)
C
Delegate to staff how policy is carried out
C
Represent the citizens of our county as a whole
C
Aggressively pursue thoughts of people of the county (seek
input)
There was much
discussion on each aspect of this role.
Role of County
Manager (per
Commissioners)
C
Day to day county activities
C
Oversees staff
C
Assists County Commissioners
C
Educates citizens
C
Service Manager (Board, Staff, Citizens)
C
Implements policy and delegates to staff
C
Leads and follows at the same time
C
Motivator
David=s input about
the role of the County Manager:
C
Sometimes feels isolated
C
Board representative to citizens of electorate
C
Not as responsible to citizens of electorate, politically
C
Rely on Board of Commissioners and vice-versa
C
Serves as a facilitator
C
Role in policy development
C
Make Board aware of all options
C
Values feed-back, values good communication
C
Sounding board (Chair to David and David to Chairman)
Commissioner
Moyer stated that the County Manager has a big role in the budget. He stated that he would like to see these
statements applied when it comes to budget deliberations. Some Commissioners are interested in outcome
based budgeting. Is the Board going to
set policy and then turn the budget over to the County Manager or are they
gonna go into each department=s budget and dictate how much they have
to work with and/or what they can and cannot do. There was some discrepancy here.
The amount of detail the Board wants in the budget remains a balancing
act.
Recess
The Board took
a short recess.
Organizational
Structure of County Government
Mr. Nicholson
reviewed the organization chart with the Board including explaining that some
of these employees are state employees.
He briefly discussed some of the Boards that assist some of these
departments, i.e. Public Health Board , D.S.S. Board (Social Services), Board
of Elections, and Travel & Tourism Board.
Budget Process
The Board was
given a Budget Process chart to help them understand what staff is doing
budget-wise, January through June. They
were also given a proposed Budget Calendar for FY 2003-2004.
STRENGTHS AND
WEAKNESSES - County/Community (internal)
Strengths:
C
Seasoned County Manager
C
Strong economy, diverse (many pillars)
C
Natural resources
C
Volunteers - Diverse Community - Experience and Talent
C
Strong tax base
C
Quality of life
C
Education system
Weaknesses:
C
Communication with neighboring counties
C
Dependent on State of North Carolina/Raleigh (subject to
Dillon=s Rule)
C
Property values- industry, development implications
C
Growth - fast growth can impact quality of life
C
Infrastructure, lack of county water and sewer, public
transportation, road network
C
Solid waste disposal, not self-sufficient
C
Decentralized county government
C
Lack of one county vision
C
Fragmented - many aspects in need of management
OPPORTUNITIES
AND THREATS (outside)
Opportunities:
C
Regional approaches to various issues
C
Diversity in Board of Commissioners
C
The problems are solvable
C
Cooperation between municipalities and county
C
Possibility for a metro-county government
C
Untapped financial resources
C
Possible centralization of services
C
How services are delivered
Threats:
C
Economic downturn
C
Possible dysfunctional Board of Commissioners
C
State of North Carolina
C
Deterioration of some of the pillars of our economy
C
agriculture - due to cost of land
C
industry - national trends
C
Threat of war
C
Terrorism or local disaster
C
Deterioration of natural resources (air, water, open space)
C
Loss of young people because of lack of jobs
Recess - Dinner
The Board
recessed and had dinner.
OVERVIEW OF
ISSUE UPDATES
David Nicholson
had given the Commissioners this update dated December 2, 2002 with sheets
attached which explained each of the issues.
He and staff discussed the issues with the Board at this time, just as
updates. No action was taken and these
items were not resolved:
C
Storm water regulations
C
Flood plains
C
Flood Insurance Program
C
Mud Creek Watershed Restoration Council
C
Air quality
C
Budgetary issues
C
Transportation issues
C
Mental Health Reform
C
Facilities
C
New Zoning Ordinance (Rewrite)
C
CCP (Comprehensive County Plan) 60-65% complete
C
Animal Control Ordinance
C
Limited English Proficiency
C
HIPPA
A number of
these issues were scheduled for more discussion at the next day=s meeting.
Chairman
Hawkins recessed the meeting at 7:40 p.m. stating that the meeting would be
called back to order promptly at 9:00 a.m. tomorrow morning.
Reconvene:
Chairman
Hawkins called the meeting back to order at 9:00 a.m. on Saturday, January 11,
2003.
COMPREHENSIVE
COUNTY PLAN
Selena Coffey
informed the Board that the project is approximately 65% complete. There are five items that are 100% complete:
Introduction Final draft complete
Factors Influencing Growth Final draft complete
Demographics Analysis Final draft complete
Growth
Management Strategy &
Land Suitability Analysis Final draft complete
Water & Sewer Services Final draft complete
Other parts of
the plan are complete as follows:
Economic Development 70%
Land Use 55%
Affordable Housing 50%
Public Schools
0%
Recreation/Open Space 10%
Transportation 0%
Plan Implementation Strategy 0%
Our consultant
had recently resigned from the project but staff had been discussing ways in
which the project could be
continued. They hope to use the
elements that have already been drafted to date. Much time and thought have
gone into this project and Staff felt certain that this information could be
used to complete the Plan as directed by the Board. Chairman Hawkins felt that the CCP could be completed this year.
It can be revised later if need be.
Announcement by
Chairman
Chairman
Hawkins had been called out of the room and when he returned he informed the
Board that this evening a group of representatives of the Cuban Government will
be in Hendersonville as well as the State Secretary of Agriculture and several
State Department officials. They will be visiting the apple processing plant
here to see how the apples are handled and packaged, etc. Mayor Niehoff plans to present the key to
the City to the Cuban officials.
Chairman Hawkins suggested that the Board of Commissioners adopt a
Resolution and possibly present a plaque as well to the visitors. Mr. Nicholson will be drafting a resolution
during this meeting for the Board=s approval before adjourning.
Mr. Nicholson
suggested that he and Mrs. Corn could go back to the office following the meeting
and type up the resolution and get it in a frame, ready for presentation, with
a ribbon and the county seal.
There was much
discussion about land use and about having community meetings to get citizen
input. Chairman Hawkins suggested the Board work on deciding how many community
meetings were needed and where and let staff begin to line those up and
advertise them. He felt that the
meetings in Mills River and 25 North should be held first.
There was some
discussion of utilizing D.C.A. to help with
the process design. There was also some
discussion that there would be a need for an increase in resources to carry out
the process.
Mr. Nicholson
felt that staff could meet with D.C.A. and report back to the Board at the
February 19 meeting. Staff is trying to
get the draft of the Zoning Ordinance Rewrite complete and to the Board in the
next two weeks.
Recess
A brief recess
was called at approximately 10:15.
LAND USE
REGULATION GUIDE
The
Comprehensive Land Use Plan was adopted by the Commissioners in 1993 and this
new plan was based on some of the land use regulation goals and
objectives. Karen Smith reviewed the
Status Report of the Henderson County Countywide Land Use Regulation Guide with
the Board. There was a question raised
as to how many of these documents need to be completed and rolled into the
Comprehensive County Plan.
MILLS RIVER
STUDY
The purpose of
this Study was to examine the north central area of the County and make
recommendations about how growth should occur.
Karen Smith put
a map up for the Board to see how the study area for the Mills River/Fletcher
Study overlapped with the proposed Town
of Mills River boundary.
Angela Beeker
informed the Board that there was a little bit of a conflict between the
charter and the assumption that the Mills River Incorporators turned in to the
General Assembly related to zoning within the new boundary by the County. The Charter seems to restrict the ability of
the Board to make zoning changes within the boundary of the new
municipality. Ms. Beeker met with
Sharon Alexander who is working with the Incorporation Group to get this
clarified - exactly what they meant by that.
She explained that they weren=t saying that you could not go in and
make changes within the jurisdiction of Mills River. They were hesitant to make changes to the charter because the
charter was what was presented for purposes of getting signatures on the
petition but they are amenable to looking at the terms of the charter, based on
her understanding from Sharon, after it=s been before the General Assembly and
asking the General Assembly to make some clarification. She asked for direction from the Board as to
whether they would be willing to leave open use in place for that 2 year period
or whether they wished to retain the ability to make changes in those
boundaries for the 2 years that county zoning is in place.
It was the
feeling that if the Board wished to proceed with the study they also needed to
keep the ability to make changes. There
was some discussion of corresponding with both the Legislators and with the
Incorporators about Henderson County=s concerns. There was also some discussion of having the Incorporators at a
future Board meeting to discuss these concerns. It was decided to allow Ms.
Beeker to address the issues Attorney to Attorney as well as Mr. Nicholson
addressing it Manager to Interim Manager.
Staff will
report back to the Board on February 19 how to incorporate the Mills River
Study into the CCP.
ZONING RE-WRITE
Karen Smith
reminded the Board that the last action the Board had was a public input
session on a September draft of the Zoning Ordinance. The Board received public input at that time and also received a
letter from the School Board. Staff had
updated the issues list and requested direction from the Board on the items on
that issues update. A workshop was
suggested.
Commissioner
Baldwin expressed that he has many questions before he can make decisions on
this issue. There was some discussion
of the best way to bring the two new Commissioners (Baldwin & Young) up to
date on this re-write issue. Angela Beeker and Karen Smith will meet with
Commissioners Baldwin and Young and answer any questions and bring them up to
date on this issue.
Angela Beeker
and Karen Smith will work on the clean-up of this re-write for the next two
weeks. The Board should set a date for
a workshop at the February 3 meeting to address the outstanding issues on the
zoning rewrite (18 points).
These were the
two lists mentioned earlier in the meeting to include in these minutes:
Parking
Lot:
Ask Travel
& Tourism for Strategy Report & Vision
Information
needs:
Copy of Mud
Creek Restoration Plan to all BOC
City of
Hendersonville - South Side Development Plan
Issue update
missing pgs. 10 & 11
Meeting with
Dr. Burnham to provide clear school development plan, growth, at least general
areas for location of new schools.
Report back by
Feb. 19 BOC mtg. - CCP Strategy & appropriate use of Land Use Reg. Guide
At
approximately 11:35 the Board still had the following outstanding issues to
deal with and discussed how to do so:
BUDGET
Performance
Budgeting
Staffing Study
Reassessment
Sales Tax
a) Article 44
b) Mills River
Incorporation
REGIONAL WATER
AGREEMENT
CABLE FRANCHISE
FACILITIES
School Projects
Human Services
Building
EMS Facilities
Animal
Control/Ordinance - Facility Issue
Library
Branches
Tuxedo School
Historic Courthouse
There was some
disagreement about the importance of some of the issues and discussion of the
need to prioritize the remaining issues.
It was the
suggestion of the Chairman to add the Human Services Building issue to the
regular agenda of the February 3 meeting.
This needs to be discussed prior to budget deliberations for next year.
A presentation
will be made to the Board at the February 3 meeting on Outcome Based Budgeting.
Regional Water
Agreement will be placed on the March 3 meeting - reply back to Asheville.
Animal
Control/Ordinance - Facility issues will be placed on the February 19 meeting
for presentation.
The Board will
plan to appoint the Blue Ribbon Committee on the Historic Courthouse at the
meeting next Wednesday, January 15. The
Board will also plan to set a workshop next Wednesday on County Facilities. The
Board will plan to set a workshop at the Feb. 3 meeting on the outstanding
issues of the Zoning Ordinance Rewrite.
There was discussion that some of the remaining items could be added to
regular meeting agendas.
PROPOSED
RESOLUTION
David Nicholson
had drafted a resolution this morning for the Board to consider adopting, to be
presented to the Cuban officials who are visiting our area today and for the
next several days.
Resolution
WHEREAS, The
United States and the Republic of Cuba have begun discussions to improve
relationships;
WHEREAS, Recent
legislation has been passed that opens up the possibility for the sell of U.S.
Agricultural products to Cuba;
WHEREAS, Representatives
of the Henderson County Agriculture Community recently visited the Republic of
Cuba to promote our local apple industry;
WHEREAS, the
Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Finance of Cuba are visiting our
community to understand our agricultural products;
SO THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the
Henderson County Board of Commissioners
welcomes the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Finance of
Cuba to our community and encourages further discussions concerning the sell of
North Carolina agricultural products to Cuba.
Adopted this 10th day of
January, 2003.
Grady Hawkins, Chairman
Henderson County Board of Commissioners
Attested
Elizabeth W. Corn, Clerk to the Board
Following some discussion, Commissioner
Moyer made the motion to adopt the resolution and authorize revisions as
necessary. All voted in favor and the
motion carried.
Chairman
Hawkins made the motion to adjourn the meeting at 12:07 p.m. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
Attest:
Elizabeth
W. Corn, Clerk to the Board Grady Hawkins, Chairman