MINUTES
STATE
OF NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY
OF HENDERSON JANUARY 4, 2001
The Henderson County Board of Commissioners met for a special called
meeting at 3:00 p.m. in the Commissioners= Conference Room of the Henderson County Office Building at 100 North
King Street, Hendersonville, North Carolina.
Those present were: Chairman Bill Moyer, Vice-Chair Marilyn Gordon,
Commissioner Grady Hawkins, Commissioner Don Ward, Commissioner Charlie Messer,
County Manager David E. Nicholson, and Clerk to the Board Elizabeth W. Corn.
Also present were: Public Information Officer Chris S. Coulson, Finance
Director J. Carey McLelland, and Project Coordinator Bill Blalock.
CALL TO ORDER/WELCOME
Chairman Moyer called the meeting to order and welcomed those in
attendance. He stated that the purpose
of this meeting was a county facilities workshop. Chairman Moyer turned the
meeting over to David Nicholson.
FACILITIES WORKSHOP
David Nicholson reminded the Board that this had originally been
scheduled for the mid-December meeting but was then postponed to a
workshop. David thanked Bill Blalock
and Carey McLelland for their assistance on this project.
At the first meeting in December, David was authorized to revisit our
county facilities and to present a facility plan, not only looking at the
Carolina Apparel Trading building but also our other county facilities.
David discussed what the facility plan goals were as follows:
Facility Plan Goals
1.
Clients - how
we serve our clients.
2.
Use of other
county facilities
3.
Space plan for all
departments.
4.
Recommendation
on needs.
5.
Eliminate
overcrowding in our facilities.
6.
Provide for
future growth.
David explained what his desired outcomes were for this meeting:
1.
Approval of Aconcept@ - Board commitment to this type of plan.
2.
Authorization
to the County Manager to renegotiate architectural contracts.
3.
Board approval
to begin work on financing documents - debt on building/land purchases.
County Manager=s Recommendation
David=s proposal for the Carolina Apparel Trading
(CAT) Building was to make it one stop shopping for Human Services, make it a
Human Services Building for county government and include the following in it:
$
Department of
Social Services (DSS) 24,470
sq. ft.
$
Dept. of Public
Health 22,180 sq. ft.
$
?Trend -
possibly add an additional building in the future - - -
$
Veteran
Services 135 sq. ft.
$
Common Spaces 9,515 sq. ft.
$
Shelled in
space 6,620 sq. ft.
Total 62,600 sq. ft.
If we remove two of the residential homes on the properties behind the
CAT building, we could have 280 parking spaces to utilize with egress onto Old
Spartanburg Highway.
Mr. Nicholson also proposed renovation of the Historic Courthouse. The historic courthouse would include the
main court building, the annex (currently Finance Dept./Magistrate), the Jail,
and the Patrol Division which is located behind the main court building. He suggested relocating county
administration to the historic courthouse as follows:
$
Commissioners
Office
$
County
Administration
County Manager=s
Office
Legal Department
Human Resources
Public Information Officer
$
Other - David
explained that he has spent substantial time trying to figure out some way to
get Travel & Tourism into the building also or is there some way to get the
Board of Elections into the building.
There are currently 18 parking spaces behind the Patrol Division. If we
take down the Jail and the Patrol Division Offices we could get 38 parking
spaces which is enough for the people who would occupy the building on a
regular basis but would not be enough for some of the meetings.
He discussed the possibility of building a parking garage there. There has been some discussion with the City
regarding a joint parking garage, either two levels with 100 parking spaces or
three levels with 150 parking spaces.
Discussion followed regarding city/county participation in a parking
garage.
Mr. Nicholson=s
proposal for the current Health Department would be to turn it into a Land
Development Building including the following:
$
Environmental
Health
$
Planning/Zoning
$
Inspections
$
Utilities
$
Fire
Marshal/Emergency Management
$
Property
Addressing
$
City Zoning
This again would be one stop shopping for inspections/permits. There
are 91 parking spaces currently on the property and that is felt to be
sufficient for the proposed use of the building.
Mr. Nicholson=s
proposal for the current County Office Building is to turn the whole building
over to the Sheriff=s
Department. There are 36,000 sq. ft. in
the building and 79 parking spaces.
Mr. Nicholson felt that there would be growth space for each of these
departments in each of these buildings for the next 7-10 years.
COSTS
Carolina
Apparel Building = Human Services Building = $
9,732,000
Historic
Courthouse = Seat of County Government once again
5,945,000
Current
Health Dept. = Land Development Building = 410,000
Current
County Office Building = Sheriff=s Department =
312,000
$15,913,000
Sale of
Buildings (at 80% of value) -1,180,000
current
Land Development Building
Nuckolls Building
and cancel lease on McAllister Building
Demolition
of jail and patrol
+ 100,000
Trace
Barn (use for county storage) +
100,000
$14,933,000
To do all this, Mr. Nicholson felt the Board will have to consider up
to a two cent tax increase. Mr. Nicholson explained that there will be costs
for the opening of the New Detention Center in next year=s budget as well as costs for the opening of
the Fletcher Elementary School.
David reviewed his desired outcomes from this meeting again:
1.
Approval of Aconcept@ - Board commitment to this type of plan.
2.
Authorization
for the County Manager to renegotiate architectural contracts
3.
Approval to
begin work on financing documents - debt on CAT building/land purchases
The Board has had the materials for several weeks to review Mr.
Nicholson=s proposal.
Chairman Moyer asked for discussion and there was much discussion.
Board concerns included but were not limited to the following:
$
Space - sq.
footage numbers
$
Parking garage
- amount of city participation - letter of intent
$
Cost of
renovation of the courthouse/? place on referendum
$
Timing critical
- keep process going
Commissioner Hawkins offered a little different concept concerning the
CAT building, adding the Board of Elections to it and therefore being able to
do away with the lease of their current location which is in excess of $30,000
a year. He proposed to leave County Administration in this building, possibly
move the Finance Department upstairs in this building and if the Detective
Division could not fit in this building with the Sheriff=s Department (into current DSS) then locate
the Detective=s Division in the current Magistrate=s Office and Finance in the Courthouse Annex.
This again would free up the McAllister Building which is currently leased.
Commissioner Hawkins stated that the Board had never really looked at what the
Sheriff=s space requirements are. He stated that we
could keep the McAllister Building for part of the Sheriff=s Department, because it=s location is close. He stated again the cost savings if the
Board of Elections were moved to the CAT building. He felt that if we propose to move county administration to the
historic courthouse at a cost of six million dollars, it should be put on a
referendum for a decision by the voters.
Commissioner Gordon felt the Board should concentrate on the concept,
not the details at this time. She was
concerned about keeping the project going and was concerned about trying to
pull the historic courthouse out of the project. She stated that the timing is critical on what to do with the
historic courthouse, partly due to projects the City of Hendersonville is
currently working on for downtown Hendersonville. Although she was not happy with the idea of a two-cent tax
increase, it might be necessary. The
Board should earnestly work to keep any increase as low as possible.
Commissioner Gordon explained that the courthouse renovation was on the
table a few years ago but the bond referendum was defeated for the schools or a
lot of these things would have been taken care of if we had not built schools
out of the revenue that was coming into the county. The plan was to do that with a separate bond issue, that didn=t happen.
We have been very successful at addressing some of the school
needs. There are other needs that have
to be addressed.
Chairman Moyer supported the plan also, stating that the Board needs to
deal with the historic courthouse. We
need to have a facilities plan for all of Henderson County Government for the
next 5-7-10 years. The Board does need
to take a hard look at space needs. He
felt the Board should follow the County Manager=s recommendation and approve the concept, stating the worst would be a
two cent tax increase and the Board would try to find a way to make that less
than two cents. The Board needs to bite the bullet and forge forward with this
concept and plan and authorize the County Manager to renegotiate with the
engineers and the architects. The Board
does want to look much closer at the Finance package.
The City of Hendersonville is interested in a parking garage and in a
multi-purpose room.
Mr. Nicholson agreed to separate the renovation costs from the costs
for plumbing, heating, electrical and air conditioning in the courthouse costs,
and how much was for handicap
accessibility. He will try to
get these numbers from the architects and bring them to the Board.
Motion
Chairman Moyer made the motion to follow the County Manager=s recommendation:
1.
Approval of the
concept - Board commitment to this type plan,
2.
Authorize the
County Manager to renegotiate architectural contracts,
3.
Authorize
working on financing documents - CAP building/land purchases,
and work on the detailed costs and spacing
needs and come up with a debt plan.
Mr. Nicholson wants to get Freeman White Architectural Firm (formerly
Grier-Fripp) to come look at the cost estimates. He explained that there are new laws on how the County must
select Architects. Mr. Nicholson is concerned
about the firm we were working with and what they were proposing. He would like to pull the Committee back
together that originally reviewed the Architects and share his concerns with
the Committee. He may come back to the
Board and ask the Board to consider a different Architectural Firm. He felt that their ideas and their focus on
the CAP building did not necessarily agree with the County Manager=s ideas and focus on the CAP building. He
also felt that the Architectural Fees were excessive.
Commissioner Hawkins stated that he could not vote for the concept
because the concept says that the Board needs to relocate County Administration
to the Historic Courthouse. He feels
that is a lot of money to renovate the Historic Courthouse for the purpose and
feels that there are other, less expensive places that County Administration
could be located. He doesn=t like the idea of mixing this move with the
preservation of the Historic Courthouse and establishing the need for county
offices to be there. He feels they are
two entirely different things.
Chairman Moyer stated that we need to go to the next step and study the
whole concept so that the Board will have the facts with which to make the best
decision possible. All the Board has
expressed concern about the project and the costs associated with it and that
was partly why this new proposal was made.
David Nicholson reminded the Board that in November he told the Board
that he wanted to take over this project.
He stated that it was time that the County Manager take over this
project and make recommendations to the Board of Commissioners and that is what
he will do.
There was again some discussion regarding the Sheriff=s Department. He currently has 126 personnel and there are 96 offices in what
is currently DSS, will that be enough space for him?
It was stated that the Board needs to see all the numbers before they
can actually make a decision.
Vote
Following much discussion, Commissioner Hawkins called the question on
the motion.
A vote was taken and Chairman Moyer=s motion passed four to one with Commissioner Hawkins voting nay.
Chairman Moyer asked the County Manager to talk with the City Manager
to see if we can get some more detail regarding the parking garage so the Board
has all the details possible prior to making a final decision.
There being no further business to come before the Board, Commissioner
Hawkins made the motion to adjourn the meeting at 5:30 p.m. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
Attest:
Elizabeth
W. Corn, Clerk to the Board William
L. Moyer, Chairman