MINUTES
STATE
OF NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY
OF HENDERSON AUGUST 16, 2000
The Henderson County
Board of Commissioners met for a regularly scheduled meeting at 9:00 a.m. in
the Commissioners= Conference Room of the
Henderson County Office Building at 100 North King Street, Hendersonville,
North Carolina.
Those present were: Chairman Grady Hawkins, Vice-Chair Bill
Moyer, Commissioner Renee Kumor, Commissioner Don Ward, Commissioner Marilyn
Gordon, County Manager David E. Nicholson, County Attorney Angela S. Beeker,
and Clerk to the Board Elizabeth W. Corn.
Also present were:
Finance Director J. Carey McLelland, Public Information Officer Chris S.
Coulson, Assistant County Attorney Jennifer O. Jackson, Planning Director Karen
C. Smith, and County Engineer Gary Tweed.
Absent was: Assistant to
the County Manager Selena Coffey.
CALL TO ORDER/WELCOME
Chairman Hawkins called
the meeting to order and welcomed those in
attendance.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Ward led
the Pledge of Allegiance to the American Flag.
INVOCATION
Rev. Rhonda Davis,
Chaplain from Margaret R. Pardee Memorial Hospital, gave the invocation.
DISCUSSION/ADJUSTMENT OF
AGENDA
Chairman Hawkins
requested an addition to the Consent Agenda - a Resolution honoring Robert G.
Parrish, Sr. He asked that Commissioner
Gordon read that Resolution at this time.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, The Honorable
Robert G. Parrish, Sr. became the first Mayor for the Town of Fletcher in
December 1989 and served in this role until his death; and,
WHEREAS, Mayor Parrish
was dedicated throughout his tenure in his efforts in seeking solutions that
work for his community and all of the Henderson County citizens; and,
WHEREAS, During his
tenure, Mayor Parrish served on various boards and committees, which include,
but are not limited to:
C
Chairman of the Land of Sky Regional Council in 1998 and
1999
C
Chairman on the Municipal Planning Organization (MPO) for
the Asheville Urban Area
C
North Carolina Joint Regional Forum
C
Henderson County Transportation Committee
C
WNC Highway Corridors Association
C
Henderson County Local Government Committee for Cooperative
Action (LGCCA)
C
North Carolina League of Municipalities on the Environmental
and Natural
Resources
(EENR) Committee; and,
WHEREAS, That even
during his illness, Mayor Parrish continued to serve his community; and,
WHEREAS, Mayor Parrish
promoted good will throughout Henderson County by his devout leadership, civic
service, and enthusiasm.
NOW, BE IT
THEREFORE RESOLVED, the Henderson County Board of Commissioners
honors the late Honorable Mayor Robert G. Parrish, Sr. for his efforts on
behalf of all of the citizens of the Town of Fletcher, Henderson County and the
State of North Carolina.
Adopted this 16th
day of August, 2000.
SIGNED BY:
Grady Hawkins,
Chairman
Henderson
County Board of Commissioners
ATTEST:
Elizabeth W.
Corn, Clerk to the Board
Commissioner Ward
requested an addition to the consent agenda and asked Commissioner Kumor to read
it - a Proclamation for ACommunity Health Center
Week@.
Commissioner Kumor read:
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, Across our
Country, August 20 - 27, 2000 has been designated as National Community Health
Center Week; and,
WHEREAS, Henderson
County is fortunate to have the local Blue Ridge Community Health Center; and,
WHEREAS, Blue Ridge
Community Health Center provides needed medical care to many of our citizens;
and,
NOW, BE IT
THEREFORE RESOLVED, the Henderson County Board of Commissioners
proclaims the week of August 20 - 27, 2000 locally as Community Health Center
Week and expresses its appreciation to the Board Members and Staff of the Blue
Ridge Community Health Center for their efforts in providing medical care to
the citizens of Henderson County.
Adopted this 16th
day of August, 2000.
SIGNED BY:
Grady Hawkins,
Chairman
Henderson
County Board of Commissioners
ATTEST:
Elizabeth W.
Corn, Clerk to the Board
Commissioner Moyer
requested one addition to the Discussion Items - AAnimal Care & Safety@.
Commissioner Kumor
requested one addition to the Update on Pending Issues as #3 - AConvention Report@.
Angela Beeker
distributed an additional list of 425 release requests on motor vehicles. These need to be added to the tax releases
on the consent agenda.
It was the consensus of
the Board to accept all the above adjustments to the agenda.
CONSENT AGENDA
Chairman Hawkins made
the motion to approve the Consent Agenda with the amendments above. All voted in favor and the motion
carried. The CONSENT AGENDA consisted
of the following:
Minutes
Minutes were presented
for the Board=s review and approval of
the following meetings: July 26, 2000, regular meeting.
Final Acceptance of
Offer for Lot #25, Block 8, Osceola Lake Subdivision
Henderson County
recently received an Offer to Purchase Lot 25, Block 8, Osceola Lake Subdivision
from Mark Case for $300.00. (This
property was acquired by the County pursuant to a Sheriff=s Sale, held for the
nonpayment of taxes in 1982.) At the
July 3, 2000 meeting, the Board of Commissioners gave a proposed acceptance of
the Offer to Purchase and directed that the Offer be advertised for Upset Bid,
and that the property be posted with notice of the Offer.
We received a total of
two (2) upset bids, the latest being a bid in the amount of Five Hundred Fifty
Dollars and No/100s ($550.00), again from Mark Case. This bid for $550.00 was advertised for upset bids; however, no
further upset bids were received. It
would therefore be appropriate for the Board to accept or to reject this latest
upset bid in the amount of $550.00
Staff had prepared a
Resolution and Quitclaim Deed for the Board=s convenience if they wish to give final
acceptance today.
Detention Center Capital
Improvement Project Monthly Report
The Board had been given
a monthly report for July 2000 on the Detention Center. There were no change orders processed this
month.
Request for Improvement
Guarantee for The Pathways of Solomon Jones Subdivision
Mr. Alan Rieger, of
Conceptual Planning Associates, on behalf of Solomon, L.L.C., had submitted a
request for approval of a subdivision improvement guarantee. Mr. Rieger would like to post an irrevocable
letter of credit to cover the cost of the remaining water, road and drainage
improvements in The Pathways of Solomon Jones subdivision. The Henderson County Planning Board approved
a Preliminary Plan for The Pathways of Solomon Jones on May 4, 1999 subject to
several conditions. On July 27, 1999,
the Planning Board approved an amended Preliminary Plan. The conditions from the May 4, 1999 approval
remained applicable.
Pursuant to Section
170-39 of the Henderson County Code, a developer may, in lieu of completing all
of the required subdivision improvements prior to Final Plat approval, post a
performance guarantee to secure the County=s interest in seeing that satisfactory
construction of the incomplete improvements occurs. One type of permitted guarantee is an irrevocable letter of
credit. Mr. Rieger intends to secure an
irrevocable letter of credit from BB&T in the amount of $235,721.44, which
includes the cost of the remaining improvements as well as the required
contingency amount of twenty-five percent (25%). The proposed completion date for the improvements is November 1,
2000.
Should the Board choose
to approve the improvement guarantee request, a draft Performance Guarantee
Agreement had been prepared by staff for the Board=s consideration. If the request is approved, the developer
must submit the letter of credit in accordance with the terms of the Agreement.
The County Attorney must review the letter of credit and certify the Agreement
as to form prior to its execution by the Chairman and the developer.
Tax Refunds
A list of seventeen (17)
refund requests had been submitted by the County Assessor for review and
approval by the Board of Commissioners.
Tax Releases
A list of one hundred
twenty-three (123) tax release requests had been submitted by the County
Assessor for review and approval by the Board of Commissioners, as well as the
additional list of 425 releases on motor vehicles (from adjustments above).
NOMINATIONS
Notification of
Vacancies
The Board was notified
of the following vacancies which will appear on the next agenda under
Nominations:
1. Apple Country
Greenway Commission - 1 vac.
2. Nursing/Adult Care
Home Community Advisory Committee - 1 vac.
Nominations
Chairman Hawkins
reminded the Board of the following vacancies and opened the floor to
nominations:
1. Nursing/Adult Care
Home Community Advisory Committee - 1 vac.
There were no nominations
at this time so this item was rolled to the next meeting.
2. Juvenile Crime
Prevention Council - 1 vac.
There were no
nominations at this time so this item was rolled to the next meeting.
3. Mountain Area
Workforce Development Board - 1 vac.
There were no
nominations at this time so this item was rolled to the next meeting.
4. Child Fatality Prevention Team - 1 vac.
There were no
nominations at this time so this item was rolled to the next meeting.
5. Recreation Advisory
Board - 1 vac.
There were two
nominations at the last meeting for this one vacancy - Gary Eblen and Roy
Huntley.
Commissioner Ward stated
that his son, Rusty Ward, would be submitting his resignation from the
Recreation Advisory Board because he is going to continue his education and
cannot make the Tuesday night meetings.
Rusty Ward will show up as a ANotification of Vacancy@ as soon as we receive
his resignation.
The Board was polled,
each one getting one vote. Gary Eblen
got three of the five votes and therefore is the new appointee to the
Recreation Advisory Board filling the unexpired term of John Shepherd
(resigned).
ANNUAL REPORT TO THE
CITIZENS
David Nicholson
distributed the 2000 AAnnual Report to the
Citizens@ to the Board, as
required by NC Law. He reminded the Board that last year=s AAnnual Report to the
Citizens@ won a national award.
This year the information was condensed and scaled down to help make it a more
useful document for the citizens.
TAX COLLECTOR ISSUES
Angela Beeker stated
that it is the time of year when tax bills are about to go out. Before the tax bills can be delivered to the
Tax Collector to be mailed, a number of things have to occur.
Prepayments
The Tax Collector must
deliver any duplicate bills printed for prepayments received by the Tax
Collector to the Finance Director and demonstrate to the Finance Director=s satisfaction that all
prepayments received have been deposited.
The Tax Collector had indicated that no prepayments were received; therefore,
no action regarding this step was necessary.
Settlement
The Tax Collector must
make settlement with the Board of Commissioners for all taxes placed in his hands for collection for the past
year.
The Tax Collector=s settlement for FY 1999
taxes is in a three ring binder that has been filed with the Clerk to the
Board. It is in the form required by
Statute. A summary of the settlement
was included as part of the agenda packet.
Approval of the settlement is required.
Settlement for delinquent taxes was contained in the report included in
the agenda packet, with supplemental information being handed out at the
meeting. There is no statutory form
required for the settlement for delinquent taxes. The delinquent tax settlement must also be approved by the Board.
Darlene Burgess, Deputy
Tax Collector, read her letter to the Board dated August 7, 2000, regarding
action for collection of delinquent property taxes (which is attached as a part
of these minutes). The current year
collection rate of annual tax bills at the close of this fiscal year for GO1 is
97.49% and is 96.30% overall (including motor vehicles bills), which is the
highest collection rate we have had in the history of Henderson County.
Angela Beeker
briefly discussed the insolvent=s list. She was
available to answer questions. She
stated that the Board must accept the settlement and the insolvent=s list. Mrs. Beeker and
Mrs. Burgess answered some questions the Board had.
Commissioner Moyer made
the motion to adopt a resolution accepting the current and delinquent
settlement and to accept the insolvent=s list as presented to the Board today. All
voted in favor and the motion carried. The insolvent=s list for FY 99 taxes,
archived in Volume I of the Henderson County Insolvent=s List in the Clerk=s Office, is hereby
incorporated by reference and made a part of these minutes.
Bond
Angela Beeker informed
the Board that it is time to set the amount of the Tax Collector and Deputy Tax
Collector=s bond. Currently is a bond for the Tax Collector
for $1,000,000 and for the Deputy Tax Collector $500,000.
Following discussion, it
was the consensus of the Board that no change in the amounts of the bonds was
necessary.
Chairman Hawkins made
the motion to set the bond as presented for the Tax Collector and the Deputy
Tax Collector. All voted in favor and
the motion carried.
Order of Collection
An Order of Collection
must be adopted at this meeting which will charge the Tax Collector with the
collection of FY 2000 taxes, plus all outstanding delinquent taxes. An Order of Collection had been prepared by
staff for the Board=s adoption.
Commissioner Gordon made
the motion to adopt the Order of Collection for the Tax Collector as
presented. All voted in favor and the
motion carried.
Motor Vehicles
Angela Beeker stated
that the Tax Collector has the authority to process a refund or a release on a
motor vehicle bill where the owner has transferred the tag or surrendered the
tag. The tax payer gets a prorated
release or refund depending on what time of the tax year the plate was
surrendered or transferred. The
Assessor=s office has been
performing that function as well as generating the reports that are required to
be sent to DMV of unpaid motor vehicles. Ms. Beeker suggested that the Board
name Mr. Baird as a Deputy Tax Collector for two purposes only, to be in strict compliance with the
statute: 105-330.6 which is the surrender
of plates statute and 105-330.7 which is the generation of that report and
sending it to motor vehicles.
Commissioner Moyer made
the motion to appoint Robert Baird (Assessor) as a Deputy Tax Collector for one
year for the two purposes listed above and to set bond at $0. In the meantime,
Robert and Terry should look at the procedure to see if it can be improved
upon. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
Organizational Issues
Chairman Hawkins stated
that there are a couple of organizational issues that the Board discussed this
time last year. He stated that many
counties have seen fit to have the Tax Assessor and Tax Collector functions
under a single administrator which they call a Tax Supervisor. He felt that the change in technology is one
of the main reasons for the change. He
stated that the Machinery Act is an old, outdated document which also affects
the interaction of these two departments. The Board has shown interest in
looking at some kind of consolidation of the Tax Collector and Tax Assessor=s Office. Henderson County is one of about three of
one hundred counties that still has an elected Tax Collector. The procedure for
selection of our Tax Collector by election was set up in about 1939. Chairman
Hawkins asked Angela Beeker to discuss what must happen to change the set up of
the two offices in our county.
Commissioner Moyer
stated that he is not sold on the idea of consolidation of the two offices yet
but stated that we should study it and see what the ramifications of putting
the two together would be and whether it is right for this county. He would like to see the Commissioners visit
a couple of counties where they have a joint operation, see what the pros and
cons are, and see what their experiences have been. The operation costs should
be reviewed also.
Commissioner Gordon
stated that we just had a very successful reassessment. The Tax Assessor=s Office did a good
job. Our tax collection rate is one of
the best in the State. She stated that
maybe we are doing something right.
Angela Beeker stated
that procedurally what would have to happen would depend on when the Board
would want this to occur. Right now,
with an elected Tax Collector, his duties cannot be taken away from him and new
duties can only be added to him with his agreement. The statute says that you can appoint the duties of the Assessor
to an elected Tax Collector but he would have to accept those duties. AAs long as you have an elected Tax Collector,
that=s about the only way it
could occur because if you don=t have an elected Tax Collector and you have an appointed
Tax Collector and you know you have an appointed Assessor and you can appoint
the same person to assume both of those roles under the statute.@
Commissioner Moyer asked
if it would be possible that Terry could resign his position and enter into a
contractural position with the Board that would define the duties of each
position and we could move forward.
Mrs. Beeker stated that yes that could happen but all the local bills
that say that that=s an elected office
would have to be repealed.
Chairman Hawkins asked
for some correspondence with other counties that are operating this way and to
meet with Mr. Baird and Mr. Lyda.
Mrs. Beeker stated that
whomever would assume these duties would also have to meet the statutory
requirements for both positions including the training, testing, etc.
Staff will research this
issue with the other counties of the State and bring back the information to
the Board.
Monthly Tax Collector=s Report
David Nicholson reminded
the Board that he had distributed the regular monthly report from the Tax
Collector.
SALE OF FOXWOOD DRIVE
PROPERTY
Staff had prepared a
proposed resolution authorizing the County Attorney and Staff to proceed with
the sale of a portion of that property recently purchased by the County
adjacent to the Solid Waste Management Facility on Stoney Mountain Road, the
property being located on Foxwood Drive.
The County has many options for disposing of this property. The Resolution contemplates the use of the
sealed bid method. This would require
that the Board set a minimum bid on the property and authorize the County
Attorney to proceed with the sale as outlined in the prepared Resolution.
The map shows the
property subdivided into two parcels.
It was proposed that these two parcels be sold as a package. A recent appraisal of the two parcels
combined states the value at $344,000.
It would be appropriate for the Board to take action by setting the
minimum bid (if desired) and authorizing the County Attorney and Staff to put
the property out for sealed bid.
Gary Tweed showed the
property in question on a map and explained where the house, barn, etc. are
located on the property.
Following discussion, it
was the consensus of the Board to hold a public auction rather than sealed bids.
Staff will do the necessary detailed documentation and bring it back to the
Board so this can be accomplished.
ARCHITECTURAL AGREEMENT
FOR COUNTY SERVICES BUILDING
Angela Beeker reminded
the Board that at the last meeting, the Board authorized Staff to proceed to
negotiate an architectural services agreement with the firm of Harley
Ellis/Asheville. Ms. Beeker, Mr.
Nicholson and Mr. Blalock met with Doug Campbell who is a principal in that
firm last week. Henderson County is not
ready to enter into a full blown architectural services agreement. Harley Ellis/Asheville prefers to charge
Henderson County for their services on a lump sum basis, not as a percentage of
the construction costs. The Board has
not yet determined the scope of the building or the project; therefore, Mr.
Campbell could not quote a lump sum cost for the total project.
Mr. Campbell had
suggested that we enter into an architectural services agreement just to get us
through the schematic design phase. At
that point he would be able to quote a more accurate figure as to what it would
cost for them to complete the project, subject to negotiation. Angela Beeker distributed a hand-out which
she referred to.
The flow chart in the
hand-out outlined the process to get us through the schematic design phase on
the County Services Building. The Board
has a workshop scheduled for August 24. The Board will be asked to make some
decisions at that meeting. If the Board
is not prepared to make decisions at that meeting, another meeting will have to
be scheduled but then the rest of the flow chart cannot proceed until the Board
makes some decisions for the architects.
Following the workshop, the architectural firm will review all the work
that has been done by Stuart Stepp. The
architects will then meet with each of the proposed groups who will be located
in the building: Department of Social Services, Health Department, Board of
Elections, County Administration, and the Land Development employees, to
present what was done before and gather more information. The architect will then decide what the
department requirements are and consult with the County Manager. Following the consultation with the Manager,
the schematic plan will be developed, followed by another consultation with the
County Manager. Then the architect will
take the schematic plans back to the individual departments to confirm their
needs and then refine the schematic floor plans, based on feedback and again
consult with the County Manager to develop exterior theme sketches, consult
with the County Manager again, and then bring that back to the Board of
Commissioners for approval or change.
The schematics would then be refined and consultation with the County
Manager would occur before developing the construction estimate and schedule,
completing this phase. We would then
negotiate the comprehensive architectural services agreement.
Ms. Beeker recommended
that in the first set of meetings with the departments, to include both the
Boards and the Staff, for the departments which have Boards and then for the
next set of meetings with Departments to have the Department Head and Chairman
only. The price quoted for this limited
services agreement is $79,000, billed at their actual cost, not to exceed
$79,000.
Following discussion,
Commissioner Moyer made the motion to approve the limited service agreement and
authorize the Chairman to execute same when the Legal Department is satisfied
that it is in final form. All voted in
favor and the motion carried.
INFORMAL PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were none.
HOLIDAY SCHEDULE
At the Board=s request, the County
Manager had reviewed the County=s holiday schedule in light of holiday schedules adopted by
other counties and the State of North Carolina. The County Manager recommended that the Board consider revising
its holiday schedule to make it consistent with the State=s schedule. This will bring Henderson County=s schedule in line with
the vast majority of other counties across the State.
The changes to Henderson
County=s schedule would be
addition of Martin Luther King, Jr.=s Birthday and a slight change in the days taken
at Christmas (3 days when Christmas falls on a Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday;
2 days in all other cases). Staff had
presented a revised Section 6.0 to the Personnel Resolution in case the
Commissioners chose to make the recommended changes to the County Holiday
Schedule.
Chairman Hawkins made
the motion to adopt the recommended change to the County Holiday Schedule and approve
the revision to the Personnel Resolution, effective in 2001. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
CLOSED SESSION
Commissioner Kumor made
the motion for the Board to go into Closed Session as allowed pursuant to NCGS
143-318.11 for the following reasons:
1.(a)(3) To
consult with an attorney employed or retained by the public body in order
to
preserve the attorney-client privilege between the attorney and the public
body,
which privilege is hereby acknowledged.
And to consider and give instructions to the attorney concerning the
handling or settlement of the following lawsuit:
Village
of Flat Rock v. Swing and Henderson County, 00-CVS-1189
All voted in favor and
the motion carried.
Chairman Hawkins made
the motion for the Board to go out of Closed Session. All voted in favor and the motion carried
PUBLIC HEARING - To
Consider a Request for Industrial Revenue Bonds for
Andy Petree Racing, Inc.
Chairman Hawkins made
the motion for the Board to go into Public Hearing at approximately 11:07 a.m. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
This public hearing was
held to consider the issuance of Industrial Revenue Bonds in the amount of $5.0
million by the Industrial Facilities and Pollution Control Financing Authority
(the AAuthority@) to benefit Andy Petree
Racing, Inc. The bonds will be used to
construct and equip a 63,000 square foot facility in Henderson County and to
acquire, renovate and equip two existing facilities for the manufacture of race
cars and related parts. The Rules and Procedures
of the North Carolina Department of Commerce require that the Board of
Commissioners approve in principal any project to be financed with Industrial
Revenue Bonds. If completed, this
project will bring 15 jobs to Henderson County from Buncombe County, and will
create an additional 10 new jobs. This
will bring their employment base to 96-100 people in Henderson County. The average wage rates for these jobs will
be $22.50 per hour. If approved, the
bonds will be fully backed by a letter of credit by Wachovia Bank, which means
that neither the County nor the State will have any responsibility toward the
repayment of these bonds.
Public Input
1. Scott Hamilton - Mr. Hamilton, with
Greater Hendersonville Chamber of Commerce, thanked the Board for their time
and consideration in holding this public hearing. He asked that the Board approve this project in principal,
stating again that Henderson County will not have any responsibility toward the
repayment of these industrial bonds.
2. Kristin Connors - Ms. Connors stated
that on May 23 the Industrial Facilities and Pollution Control Authority met
for the first time to consider the issuance of the bonds and to give its
preliminary approval to the bonds. This
action is necessary under Federal Tax Law so that the Company can start
spending money that will later be reimbursed by the bond proceeds. The Company then prepared an application to
the Department of Commerce in Raleigh and as part of that application the
Commerce Department requires that the County Commissioners of the County in
which the bonds will be issued meet and approve the project and the issuance of
the bonds in principal and the requirement that there be a public hearing is a
Federal Tax Law requirement. As part of
the Commerce application, the Company has to certify that it will meet the
average manufacturing wages of the County and the Company also has to make a
job certification to Commerce. Part of
the Commerce application also involves a review of the project by the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and that department has to sign
off before the project can be approved.
Subject to those requirements, the Department of Commerce will review
and approve the project and issue a State Volume Cap for the Bonds. The Bonds
then go to the Local Government Commission which is the State oversight agency
for the public debt issued in North Carolina.
They conduct a complimentary but separate review of the project and the
ability of the Company to repay the bonds.
Part of that application requires that the bonds either be directly
purchased by a bank or be backed by a letter of credit. In this case, the bonds will be backed by a
letter of credit by Wachovia Bank.
After the Local Government Commission gives its approval to the bonds
there is yet another step. The Company
has to come back to the Authority to get final approval for the bonds and the
various documents that will be signed in connection with the issuance of the
bonds.
Neither the faith in
credit of the County nor the Authority are pledged to payment of the
bonds. That rests solely upon the
Company.
3. Steve Barkdoll - Mr. Barkdoll,
Vice-President and General Manager of Andy Petree Racing, stated that they are
glad to be located in Henderson County.
He stated that they are not a race track but a racing team. They manufacture race cars. There are only three teams in the Winston
Cup that manufacture everything in house, they are one of those teams. They currently employ about 78 people in the
Henderson County area. With the new
project and new building they will bring 14 new jobs to the Henderson County
area from Buncombe area and create 6-10 jobs over the next three years, at
least. With the growth of Nascar like
it is today it could be many more jobs for the area. They meet the average salary, being above the average salary of
manufacturing jobs in the area. They
used a local general contractor to build, currently being in the middle of
building the project. They bought the land
and are building a 63,000 square foot area where the cars will just be
manufactured. There will be no engines
manufactured in the new building. They
will have office space in the new building also. The project will be finished some time in late October but
because the season runs through the third week in November, they will probably
not move into the new building until some time in November.
Chairman Hawkins made
the motion for the Board to go out of Public Hearing. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
Commissioner Kumor
introduced the following resolution, the title of which was read:
APPROVAL IN
PRINCIPAL OF INDUSTRIAL PROJECT FOR
ANDY PETREE
RACING, INC., AND THE FINANCING
THEREOF WITH
INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS IN THE
PRINCIPAL
AMOUNT OF UP TO $5,000,000
WHEREAS, the
Henderson County Industrial Facilities and Pollution Control Financing
Authority (the AAuthority@) has agreed to assist in the financing
under the North Carolina
Industrial and Pollution Facilities Financing Act (the AAct@) of an
industrial project by
Andy Petree Racing, Inc. (the ACompany@), to acquire, construct and equip a
63,000 square foot
facility and to acquire, renovate and
equip two existing facilities for the manufacture of race cars
and related parts (the AProject@) in Flat Rock,
Henderson County, North Carolina, and has
indicated that agreement by the execution
of an Inducement Agreement between the parties dated
May 23, 2000, and;
WHEREAS, under
159C-7 of the North Carolina General Statutes each project must be
approved by the Secretary of the
Department of Commerce and under Article 51B of Chapter
143 of the North Carolina General
Statutes, the Federal Tax Reform Allocation Committee must
allocate a sufficient amount of North
Carolina=s Avolume cap,@ as defined in
Section 146 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the ACode@) to the
financing; and
WHEREAS, the
Rules of Procedures of the North Carolina Department of Commerce
require that the governing body of a
county approve in principle any project to be financed under
the Act; and
Commissioner Kumor moved the passage of
the foregoing resolution and Chairman Hawkins seconded the motion, and the
resolution was passed by the following vote:
Ayes: Commissioners
Hawkins, Moyer, Kumor, Ward and Gordon.
Nays: None
Not voting: None
Commissioner Gordon stated that she is
comfortable in approving this project and thinks it is an excellent opportunity
to point out some of the very positive benefits of this type of business in our
community, it adds a dimension that=s important.
PUBLIC INPUT SESSION -
Abandonment of Bridge # 42 on Stepp Mill Road (SR #1734)
Chairman Hawkins made the motion for the
Board to go into Public Hearing. All
voted in favor and the motion carried.
Karen Smith made the following staff
comments from the Planning Department.
The County has received a petition asking that the County request NCDOT
to abandon and remove from the State Maintenance system Bridge # 42 which is
located on Stepp Mill Road (SR #1734).
NCGS 136-63 sets out the procedure by
which a road may be abandoned. This
statute requires that before NCDOT abandons a road in the manner requested, the
Board of Commissioners must take action to request that the road be abandoned.
Such Board action must be based upon a finding that Athe best interest of the
people of the County will be served thereby.@ At the August 7, 2000 meeting, the Board
scheduled the public input session in order to receive public comments on the
proposed abandonment of Bridge #42 on Stepp Mill Road. The Board also requested that the Planning
Department conduct a study of the proposed abandonment. Due to the short time period between the
August meetings of the Board of Commissioners, the Planning Department
presented it=s impact study at this
second meeting.
Staff sent letters informing the
petitioners and property owners along Stepp Mill Road of the public input
session and notice of such session was scheduled to be published in the
Times-News on August 13, 2000. Staff
also contacted the Sheriff, Fire Marshal and EMS Director about this matter and
encouraged them to submit comments prior to the input session. The Planning Department will review comments
received from safety officials in the impact study.
If the Board were to find that the best
interest of the citizens of Henderson County would be served by the
abandonment, appropriate action could be taken by the Board by the adoption of
the proposed resolution which requests that the North Carolina Department of
Transportation abandon Bridge # 42 on Stepp Mill Road (SR #1734).
Planning Staff=s Study
State Bridge #42 is on Stepp Mill
Road. It is about one mile southeast of
the intersection of Stepp Mill Road and Ridge Roads. The bridge is situated on top of a dam adjacent to the Stepp
Mill. It is approximately 14 feet wide and 35 feet 3 inches long. There is a maximum weight capacity on the
bridge for single vehicles that is 16 tons and for truck tractors and
semi-trailers it=s 21 tons. Stepp Mill Road is paved from the
intersection with Ridge Road for about 3/4 mile, then everything else to the
southeast is a gravel surface. The
right-of-way of Stepp Mill Road is about 40 feet however the road does narrow
as you start to approach the bridge on either side. At several points along Stepp Mill Road, it is difficult for two
passenger vehicles to pass each other and the bridge is a single lane
bridge. There are some sharp curves on
Stepp Mill Road which make it difficult to pass other vehicles. Based on a rough estimate, there are more
than 80 households in the immediate vicinity of the bridge, at least 25 are to
the northwest between the bridge and Big Oak Road, 55 or more are on the
southeastern side of the bridge.
Additional growth is expected in the area. She spoke of a 442 acre piece of property where a 79 lot
subdivision has received development and plan approval from the Planning Board,
it=s called Oleta Falls and
it does access on the very southeast end of Stepp Mill on the southeast side of
Union Hill. You do have to cross Union
Hill Road from the bridge. That is the
only development that Ms. Smith was aware of in the area.
Staff looked at some traffic count information
that NC DOT has available. They looked
at information between the time of 1996 and 1998 and found that an average of
295 vehicles per day were shown on the area just south of the bridge on Stepp
Mill Road, compared to 755 vehicles on Oleta Road, 430 on Union Hill and 900 on
Stepp Mill Road northeast of Chestnut Stump Road.
Looking at access - From general
impressions it appears that the proposed abandonment would more significantly
impact people on the southeast side of the bridge. They would have alternate access via Oleta Road and Union Hill
Roads. Union Hill is paved in its
entirety and the State is currently preparing to pave Oleta Road.
Staff contact Dr. Kohlan Flynn with the
Board of Education Office just to get some information about school buses. Because of the bridge width and weight
specifications, school buses do not cross the bridge. Dr. Flynn did not have any other comments to offer.
Correspondence with emergency services
officials - Sheriff George Erwin did not have any concerns regarding the
proposed abandonment. Fire Marshal
Rocky Hyder said that currently the fire apparatus do not cross the bridge as
it is. They have to respond via Union
Hill or Oleta Roads but he did make a comment that it could delay volunteer
fire fighters who are trying to arrive at the scene of a fire. Emergency Medical Services Director Tom
Edmundson stated that ambulance service to households on the southeastern side
of the bridge will be delayed by approximately seven minutes as a result of the
abandonment. He also expressed hope
that there would possibly be an alternative route rather than abandoning a
bridge. Apparently ambulances are
crossing the bridge at this time.
Staff suggested in their report that the
Board take into consideration three points:
1. Access to homes, businesses, property
and other sites in the vicinity of the bridge,
2. Traffic pressures related to future
residential development, and
3. Comments from the EMS Director
regarding ambulance response times.
Josh Freeman, Planner with the Planning
Department, showed several photographs of the bridge and surrounding area
including the pond, the mill, etc.
Staff had talked with someone from NC DOT
who stated that if the bridge is closed, they will cul de sac the road on
either side of the bridge. They did not
receive any formal comments from NCDOT.
Chairman reminded the Board that we have
received an additional petition to keep bridge # 42 open.
Angela Beeker stated that the Board must make
a determination on the second petition but the Board=s job today is to
determine whether it is in the best interest of the citizens to request that
the bridge be closed. The Board has no
authority beyond that point. The
Department of Transportation will take the request and will have to make their
own independent determination of whether the bridge should be closed. The Board of Transportation actually makes
that decision. They have some
independent authorities that have nothing to do with the Board of
Commissioners, regardless of what the Board requests today. The final decision actually rests with NC
DOT.
Public Input
1. Larry M. Mims - Mr. Mims lives off of
Stepp Mill Road, through the bridge. He
spoke in opposition to the bridge closing. He stated that there is no good
reason to close the bridge. A new bridge is long overdue. This project has been on the map for three
years.
2. Larry Justus - Mr. Justus requested
to be allowed to speak last.
3. Alvin Stepp - Mr. Stepp mentioned
the petition opposing the closing of the road.
He turned in an additional two pages to be added to that petition. He asked that the Board take into
consideration their petition asking that the bridge be maintained by NC DOT.
4. Thomas Sitton - Mr. Sitton has lived
on the road approximately two years and crosses the bridge often. He thinks that the road has been there
approximately 150 years and that it has been estimated that there are 350 - 400
cars crossing the bridge daily. Access
would be cut off to many people if the bridge is closed. He stated that the pond is filled in with
silt and weeds. He asked AWould you like to wait
an extra seven minutes if you were having a heart attack for an EMT ...?@
5. Dan Coon - Mr. Coon lives above
the bridge in the area that would be affected.
He stated that it would be inconvenient but there are two other routes
that can be taken. He doesn=t want to see someone
put out of their house. He spoke in
favor of the bridge abandonment.
6. Jennifer Coon - Ms. Coon also lives
above the bridge and stated she would have to travel two more miles or so to
get to wherever she wanted to go. She
stated that this road is too narrow, it is too windy. She spoke in favor of the bridge abandonment. Her opinion was
that this is convenience versus safety.
7. Amy Walden - Ms. Walden lives on
the southeast end of Stepp Mill Road.
She has owned the property for about ten years and lived there about six
years. She spoke in favor of the
abandonment of the bridge. She spoke of
several near accidents and several accidents that have happened because of the
narrowness of the road.
8. Kay Jones - Ms. Jones asked what would happen if
the road is closed? Isn=t another bridge going
to be built? Does anybody know?
Angela Beeker stated that it is up to NC
DOT to make that determination. All that is at issue today is whether that
bridge should be abandoned or not. That
is the only issue before this Board today.
Ms. Jones stated that she lives on the
southeast end of Stepp Mill Road and uses the road daily. She opposes the closing of the road.
9. Evelyn Hill-King - Ms. Hill-King stated
that she came for information. She has
heard some discussion on the bridge for years.
She has lived on Union Hill Road since 1957. She has learned to drive cautiously, slowly, and to stay on her
side of the road and watch out for other drivers. She spoke in opposition to the closing of the bridge.
10. Roy Murray, Jr. - Mr. Murray lives on
the southeast end of the bridge, the person living the closest to the
bridge. Mr. Murray stands to lose his
home if the bridge is replaced. He
spoke in favor of the abandonment. Mr. Murray has lived there more than two
years, has never heard anything about the bridge. He stated that he felt the money could be used for something that
is needed more. He spoke of the ducks,
the frogs, and the aquatic life that live in the pond as well as the
birds.
Larry Justus - Representative Justus
stated that the bridge has been an on-going problem for years with the
narrowness of the road.
History of the situation - Representative
Justus=s Grandfather built part
of the mill, part of it preceded his Grandfather. It is over 100 years old. Mr. Justus addressed the fact that
others had brought up about the mill not being cared for. He said if they would walk around the back
they would see the thousands of dollars that have been spent to take care of
the flood damage that happened to the mill a few years ago. He stated that the mill is a historic
place. The little building adjacent to
the mill was an old post office. If a
new bridge is built, a historic building will be destroyed and probably damage
the old post office. Mr. Justus stated
that it will not always look like it looks now, he plans to clean it up and
make it a place of beauty once again.
He mentioned the housing development that
will be built nearby. Not long ago, a
gentleman stopped by and asked to go in with Mr. Justus on cleaning up the mill
and restoring it to working condition so that the homeowners in the new
development could drive by and see the wheel turning. He stated that the road on the other side of Stepp Mill bridge is
so steep that even if it were paved, it would be hazardous in inclement
weather.
He asked that the record show that he and
his wife, Carolyn, wish to be a good neighbor.
They would like for people to have access to their homes. They will do everything in their power to
see that they do. He also pointed out
that it is just as quick to get to Dana from the top of Union Hill Road going
down Oleta Road as it is to come through Stepp Mill Road. It=s just as quick from the mid point of Union Hill
Road to get to Hendersonville so there=s not that much inconvenience.
He explained his idea about why Stepp
Mill Road is not paved, which was political.
Mr. Justus questioned some of the
petitioner=s signatures on the
opposition petition.
Mr. Justus read a letter into the record
that he received this morning:
ATo Whom It May Concern:
Recently there
has been a petition being signed in our community concerning keeping
Stepp Mill Road open. My Father and I, being long-term property
owners in the community, signed this petition; however, we were lied to and not
advised of all the facts regarding the closing of the road and bridge.@
In other words, he told Mr. Justus that he was told that Mr.
Justus was in favor of closing the bridge and that=s the only reason they
signed it.
Mr. Justus stated that probably the best
thing to do would be recommend closing the road and let the State deal with
it. Mr. Justus stated that
condemnation is supposed to be used only when there is a pressing public use
and no other way to solve the problem.
He stated that he is dedicated to finding
a solution that everybody can live with.
11. Charles Justus - Mr. Justus has lived
on Stepp Mill and Union Hill for 20 years.
For 18 years he was an advocate to get Stepp Mill widened and paved and
an advocate to do something about the bridge.
Five or six years ago, residents circulated a petition to get something
done about the bridge. When the
petition was circulated, Mr. Justus put a footnote on it that he and his wife
would donate the whole entire 50 feet for the state right-of-way from Union
Hill to the bridge. They never heard a
word back concerning this. Two years
ago the Murrays put their house in on a knoll and invested in a well, septic
tank, house, underpinning, etc. Now
they have three kids that will have to pick up and move, why?
12. Larry Glover - Mr. Glover lives at
the top of Stepp Mill Road and has for approximately 10 years. He spoke in favor of the abandonment of the
bridge.
13. Mary Sexton - Ms. Sexton spoke
about compassion versus inconvenience.
She spoke in favor of the abandonment of the bridge.
? Lady from above spoke
again -
She spoke in favor of the abandonment of the bridge. She spoke about the alternate traffic patterns.
14. Carolyn Justus - Mrs. Justus lives at
the bridge. She stated that she and
Larry were in Raleigh when the State held the public hearing on the
bridge. She heard from her neighbors
that it was not an orderly meeting and that nothing could be resolved.
She stated that Roy Murray had done a
phenomenal job of not only trying to protect his own land but trying to bring
the neighbors together in agreement. He
had passed around the petition for signatures before the Justuses ever saw the
petition.
? Man from above spoke
again -
He stated that he would hate to see Mr. Murray lose his property. He couldn=t understand why a
compromise couldn=t be reached to keep the
road open and not take the Murray property.
Larry Glover spoke again
- Mr. Glover stated that there is a way to keep
the road open - if Mr. Justus fixes the dam so that the bridge is on a stable
foundation. The road could stay just
like it is. The state folks in Raleigh
need to agree as to the condition of the foundation of the bridge.
Commissioner Ward made the motion to out
of Public Input. All voted in favor and
the motion carried.
There was much discussion.
Angela Beeker asked to be able to make
one point here - the DOT on it=s own right now could abandon the bridge and replace it with
another bridge but the DOT cannot on it=s own right now just decide to abandon that
bridge. They have to replace it if they
on their own authority abandon it. If
the Board of Commissioners requests that the bridge be closed, then they will
have to decide whether to abandon the bridge and just leave it or replace it on
their own authority. If the Board does not request abandonment, DOT does not
have the option of just abandoning the road, as she reads the statutes.
Following more discussion, it was the
consensus of the Board to relay to the NC Department of Transportation via a
strong letter a request that they meet again with the residents of the area to
try to come up with a solution and to express the significant safety concerns. The Board of Commissioners has not heard
from DOT and therefore has not heard from one of the major players here. They do not know of any alternate plans DOT
may have. It was the consensus of the
Board that they did not have enough information to make a decision at this
time. At such time as the Board feels
that they have sufficient information, they will place this back on the Board
agenda.
Chairman Hawkins called a 10 minute
recess.
IMPORTANT DATES
Chairman Hawkins stated that Commissioner
Ward had a conflict with the workshop scheduled on August 24 at 1:00 p.m. It was the decision of the Board to move
that meeting to 8:30 a.m.
Chairman Hawkins had talked with Chairman
Lapsley of the DSS Board about holding a joint meeting. Mr. Lapsley could meet on September 25. That meeting was set for 3:00 p.m.
Commissioner Ward had another commitment
and left at this time.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY
COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT
Pursuant to the Environmental Advisory
Committee=s (EAC) Charter, AThe Committee will give
periodic reports on its activities six months initially, then annually to the
Board of Commissioners@. The Committee has been meeting for one
year.
Ken Weitzen, Chair of the Committee, gave
the Board an update on the EAC=s activities to date.
Mr. Weitzen stated that this report
covers the second six months of the Environmental Committee=s first year. A six-month report was submitted on January
19, 2000, that covered the monthly meetings from August 1999 through January
2000. This report outlines the progress
made from February through July 2000.
Western North Carolina
Regional Litter Summit. EAC representatives attended the meeting at Haywood
Community College in March 2000. This was the kick-off for the Clean NC 2000
campaign for this part of the state.
Ken Weitzen felt disappointed in the
meeting, that there really wasn=t any specific support for local communities to work on
Clean NC 2000. It was more an
anti-litter pep rally.
Bonclarken/Charlotte
Christian School Service Project. EAC
coordinated a service project which resulted in 75 students plus staff and EAC
picking up litter at five local sites in March of 2000, three of which were
county parks.
Recycling Forum. EAC representatives
attended the meeting at the Henderson County Public Library in March of 2000.
Adopt-A-Highway. EAC set a goal to
increase Adopt-A-Highway contracts in the county, and sent letters of
appreciation to program volunteers in April 2000. This was part of EAC=s anti-litter campaign.
They are studying the maps that show where the major gaps are and trying to
fill those gaps.
Alternative Fuels
Vehicles.
Completed study and made recommendations to the BOC in April 2000. They did an extensive study and recommended
that the County take a wait and see approach to alternative fuel vehicles.
Chairman Hawkins added that Henderson
County quietly switched to BP Amoco low sulfur fuel for the county fleet of
vehicles. We=d been using low sulfur
fuel all along in our diesel fleet.
Litter Hotline. Developed and
implemented a litter hotline in April 2000. At the end of six months of
operation, they plan to evaluate extensively and report to the Board. This is the only area where they have
requested county funding and it is to pay for the ads in the newspaper.
Household Hazardous
Waste Proposal.
EAC studied the plan and recommended in May 2000 that the Board of Commissioner
approve the proposal.
VWIN Program. Consulted with James Hutcherson (BRCC) and
Mary Jo Padgett (ECO) in March of 2000.
EAC representatives attended VWIN ATen Year Celebration@ program at UNCA in June
2000. EAC invited Rick Maas (EQI) and
Marylin Westphal, VWIN Project Manager, to attend the August 9, 2000 EAC
meeting. They agreed to attend to update
the EAC on VWIN and answer any questions regarding the program.
Big Sweep. EAC submitted a
resolution to the Board of Commissioners declaring September 16, 2000, as Big
Sweep Day. EAC agreed to work with a
local Big Sweep Committee to plan and implement a major clean up of Mud Creek.
They also plan to look at water quality in a more general way.
Ken Weitzen thanked the Board and stated
the appreciation for the staff support they have received from Nippy Page. He spoke briefly about attendance
requirements and stated that they may come back to the Board with a
recommendation to revisit the attendance requirements and possibly tighten them
up some.
Commissioner Moyer stated that Clean NC
2000 could have been much more effective, but an education program for schools
and for the public is necessary and it just has not been forth-coming from the State. The Committee did good work but the counties
cannot fund the education program that is needed.
UPDATE ON PENDING ISSUES
1. Assignment of
Economic Development
Chairman Hawkins stated that this was a
left-over house keeping item from the implementation of a County Legal
Department. The Assistant County
Manager had been doing this for the Board but now we don=t have an Assistant
County Manager. Someone needs appointed
to keep up with the Economic Development Package, the computations and do the
monitoring.
Mr. Nicholson volunteered to handle the
initial role in Economic Development.
Mr. Nicholson stated that Economic Development is a three-pronged
approach:
1.
Guidelines, the economic
development guidelines allow staff to go into any discussion with an industry
with some information in hand,
2. Contract, the Legal Department will have to be heavily
involved in this part of the process,
3. Monitoring, part of this duty will go to the Legal
Department, as the Paralegal=s
responsibility.
2. Safety Handbook
David Nicholson distributed to the Board the
recently published Henderson County Employees= Safety & Health
Handbook. The handbook summarizes our many required OSHA programs that we have
a guideline for. It gives the employees
the opportunity to go to one place to look up all the county=s rules and regulations on
safety and health issues.
As County Employees, the Commissioners must
sign the back page acknowledging receipt of a copy of the handbook and turn it
back in to the Human Resource Department (HRD).
3. Convention Report
Commissioner Kumor attended a workshop at the
NACo Conference on AJoint Use Agreements@. Communities are beginning joint use agreements with their school
boards because of the school facilities located in communities across the state
and how all the citizens can take advantage of the school facilities by such an
agreement drawn up up-front. Schools may be a good place to have small
community parks.
She had a packet of information on the topic
which she will share with the Board.
TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY
COMMITTEE=S REPORT
Commissioner Moyer is Chairman of the
Transportation Advisory Committee. He
presented their six month report to the Board of Commissioners.
The Transportation Advisory Committee has
held five meetings since the Board of Commissioners established it in February
2000. The Committee consists of
representatives from the County, the four municipalities, the School Board,
Sheriff=s Department, North Carolina Department of
Transportation and various interested citizens. Although they have just started down the road of identifying the
varied transportation issues, Mr. Moyer believes that this Advisory Board has
the potential to address any important safety and other transportation
improvements in our community.
March 2, 2000
The Committee=s first meeting was
primarily organizational. It included a
review of the Committee=s Charter as established
by the Board of Commissioners. These
objectives include the following:
C
Review
and make recommendations on the Clear Creek Connector
C
Assist
with the development of a Thoroughfare Plan
C
Review
and make recommendations of TIP Projects
C
Recommend
transportation enhancements or safety projects
The Committee heard from Ed Green,
District Engineer with the Department of Transportation. Mr. Green asked the Committee to assist DOT with
identifying safety concerns and briefly discussed some funding options. Mr. Green will be supplying the Committee
with accident information and traffic counts.
Dr Kohlan Flynn will provide the Committee with the school bus driver
road safety concerns. Captain Rodney
Raines of the Sheriff=s Department will also
provide a listing of road safety issues.
Mr. Ray Bryson will gather safety information from other emergency
service providers.
April 13, 2000
The Committee heard a presentation from
Ms. Nora McCann. Ms. McCann is the
NCDOT Transportation Engineer who will be assisting with the development of
both the County and City of Hendersonville=s Thoroughfare Plans. NCDOT will begin gathering information on population, housing,
employment, traffic flows, accident history and roadway and bridge safety. Informational public workshops will be held
to seek local input on the Plan. A
public hearing is required to receive formal comments. NCDOT will not adopt the Plan until the unit
of government has approved it. The
State model should be available for review in January or February of 2001.
The Committee also discussed various
upcoming transportation public hearings, again discussed the DOT funding
stream, and received the information on road safety concerns from various
members.
May 25, 20000
The Committee heard a detailed
presentation from Ron Leatherwood, NCDOT 14th Division Board Member,
on DOT=s funding stream and
allocation process. The total DOT
budget is over 3 billion dollars. These funds come from the Federal Government,
gasoline tax, fees and State funds. The
major expenditures are TIP Construction, highway maintenance, agency funding,
administration, municipal aid and TIP Adjustments.
Mr. Leatherwood also addressed several
specific projects for Henderson County.
These included US 64 West, Upward Road, Short Street Extension, and the
need for breaks in the I-26 guardrails.
Mr. Leatherwood encouraged the Committee to suggest projects for the
Small Urban Funds.
June 29, 2000
The Committee reviewed a draft set of
By-laws and Rules of Procedure the County=s Legal Staff had prepared. After approving these drafts, the Committee
heard about Land of Sky Regional Council=s Inter-Modal Technical and Policy Advisory
Committee=s work. This group is developing a seamless
transportation system for the region.
The Committee will request a presentation on this group=s work at a later date.
The Committee went on record requesting
that NCDOT consider preserving the High Bridge over US 176 that was scheduled
to be demolished when the new bridge is completed. The Committee agreed to work with persons in this area for uses
of the bridge.
The Committee learned that DOT has begun
the initial data gathering for the Thoroughfare Plan. Staff was asked to investigate the benefits of creating a Rural
Planning Organization or RPO. The
Committee expressed its interest in coordination of the City and County=s Plans. The Committee also discussed the next TIP
and the process of reviewing it.
July 27, 2000
The Committee organized itself into four
sub-committees. These sub-committees, which will report back to the full Board,
are Safety, Thoroughfare Plan, Transportation Improvement Plan and Public
Transportation.
Ed Green gave his presentation on high traffic/accident
areas. The criteria that DOT uses to
establish these concerns come from the Highway Patrol. Mr. Green will be working with the Safety
Sub-Committee. The Committee also
discussed the High Bridge. DOT has
decided to save the bridge for pedestrian use.
Discussion was held concerning future uses of the bridge.
The Committee discussed transportation
issues with Ed Green such as US 64 West, resurfacing projects, Church Street
and Upward Road.
Summary
The Transportation Advisory Committee has
begun to address several important issues in our County. Mr. Moyer stated that they look forward to
working with the North Carolina Department of Transportation on major projects
such as the Thoroughfare Plan and T.I.P. within the next year.
CANE CREEK WATER &
SEWER DISTRICT
There was no business.
MUD CREEK WATER &
SEWER DISTRICT
There was no business.
ANIMAL CARE & SAFETY
This was an add-on by Commissioner
Moyer. He stated that since this has been
getting so much attention in the newspaper lately, he felt that it would be
good for the Board of Commissioners to talk about concern in this area and
about what is being done by the Board of Health and others. Obviously there is a concern about the care
of animals in the community and animal cruelty. Mr. Moyer feels that there is a lack of adequate
information. You hear about the cruelty
cases but with no quantfication of types, etc.
Commissioner Moyer got a call from Linda
Monteith, Director of the Humane Society, who was mentioning the type of
complaints they are getting.
Commissioner Moyer asked her to start to keep a log of the types of
complaints they get. She will do this
for two months and give the Board a report.
Mr. Moyer stated that it will be good to get some concrete information,
see the type of problems that are developing and then take the appropriate
action.
Commissioner Gordon reminded those
present that the recent budget approval included some additional staffing for
the Animal Shelter, the county operated facility. Part of the job duties of one of the additional staff persons
will be initial investigation of animal cruelty reports, then referring those
to the Sheriff=s Department once they
establish validity. A recent
conversation with Brenda Miller disclosed that they are in the process of
interviewing for that position and hopes to have someone on board real
soon. There is a training time involved
here before the program can be up and running.
She reinforced that the Board is concerned about these complaints and is
taking steps to address them.
David Nicholson explained how the process
will work:
C
an
initial call will go out to animal control
C
animal
control will go out and look at the cruelty issue
C
they
will handle the issue if it is a matter of talking to the owner
and getting water, food,
or shade for the animal
C
if
the animal control officer is threatened or if it is truly cruelty, the animal
control officer will
radio the Sheriff=s Department for
help.
Animal cruelty is a felony in the State
of North Carolina. The Animal Control
Officers will not be enforcing this but rather the Sheriff=s Department staff will.
Chairman Hawkins also explained that the
County is in the process of looking at upgrading the animal shelter. It has also been suggested that as we expand
our use of cable TV that we video the animals available for adoption so that
they can be shown on cable TV, channel #11.
There being no further business, the
meeting was adjourned by the Chairman.
Attest:
Elizabeth W. Corn, Clerk to the Board
Grady Hawkins, Chairman