MINUTES
STATE
OF
The Henderson County
Board of Commissioners met for a regularly scheduled meeting at
Those present were: Chairman Bill Moyer, Vice-Chairman Charlie
Messer, Commissioner Larry Young, Commissioner Chuck McGrady, County Manager
Steve Wyatt, Assistant County Manager
Also present were:
Planning Director Anthony Starr, Fire Marshal Rocky Hyder, Finance Director J. Carey
McLelland, Utilities Director Doyle Freeman, County Engineer Gary Tweed, and
Research/Grants Coordinator
Absent at the beginning
of the meeting was Commissioner Shannon Baldwin who had called and would be
late to the meeting. The minutes are
marked when he arrived.
CALL TO ORDER/WELCOME
Chairman Moyer called
the meeting to order and welcomed all in attendance.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Young led
the Pledge of Allegiance to the American Flag.
INVOCATION
Steve Wyatt gave the
invocation.
INFORMAL PUBLIC COMMENTS
There
was discussion of:
1.
Using
more of the existing space for classrooms, rehabbing the administration area
rather than building new, and utilizing the current cafeteria area.
2.
The
relative merits of building a completely new Fletcher clone in the current
baseball field area and demolishing the current location. Some had concern about demolishing relatively
recent structures, well built and in good condition but others had none at all,
considering an all new school building, if possible, worth the added $2.5
million estimated cost differential.
The results – two
alternatives: first a completely new school, a Fletcher clone with demolition
of the existing plant and second, the original bid package design with new
construction relocated about 20 yards south and no physical connection between
the current, retained structures and new construction to allow for an easier,
perhaps safer, two phase project rather than the original three phase plan.
Result – a shorter
construction time frame and an estimated $300,000 in project cost saving.
No decision was
reached. It will be decided with more
staff input at the regular meeting on August 14.
Chairman Moyer stated
that he thought once the Board adopted the tax rate, by law they are not
allowed to change it. He asked the
Russell Burrell stated
that the only event allowing the Board to change it is if there is litigation
involving schools and the school funding. That’s the only time the Board is
allowed to change the rate once it is set.
Mr. Baird then
readdressed the Board, stating that in that case his recommendation would be
that these funds be set aside for fund balance.
DISCUSSION/ADJUSTMENT OF AGENDA
Chairman Moyer requested
one addition to the consent agenda, it is in the notebooks but did not get
printed on the agenda – “H – Expansion of the Fire Insurance Districts to Six
Miles”.
There were no other
changes suggested.
Commissioner Messer made the motion to approve the agenda
with the one addition. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner McGrady made the motion to adopt the consent
agenda with the one additional item. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
Tax Collector’s Report
Terry F. Lyda, Henderson
County Tax Collector, had provided the Tax Collector’s Report dated
At the Board’s request,
Carey McLelland had provided the EMS Accounts Receivable Report as information
for consent approval.
Referral of Special Use Permit Amendment Application for
“River Stone”
Planned Unit Development to the Planning Board
Don Hunley, P.E. with
William G. Lapsley & Associates, P.A. for Windsor-Aughtry Company,
submitted a development plan and applied for a special use permit amendment (on
file in the Board of Commissioners’ office) to be allowed to amend the existing
Special Use Permit (#SP-05-01) for the planned unit development known as “River
Stone”.
Pursuant to section
200-33.A of the Henderson County Code, before the Board of Commissioners may
act on such a request, this matter requires “the advice and recommendation” of
the Henderson County Planning Board.
Under section 200-33.F(3), “[t]he Board of Commissioners shall not issue
a special use permit until it has received recommendations from the Planning
Board. If no action is taken by the
Planning Board within 45 days of the meeting at which the Planning Board first
considers the development plan, it shall be deemed to have recommended approval
of the development plan, and the Board of Commissioners may proceed to act upon
the application.”
If the Board is so
inclined, the following motion was suggested:
I move that the application for a special use permit
amendment for the planned unit development
by
Referral of Special Use Permit Application for “Vistas at
Champion Hills”
Planned Unit Development to the Planning Board
Chris Day, P.E. with
Civil Design Concepts, P.A. for Kasey-Phillips Development, LLC, submitted a
development plan and applied for a special use permit (on file in the Board of
Commissioners’ office) to be allowed to create a planned unit development to be
known as “Vistas at Champion Hills”.
Pursuant to section
200-33.A of the Henderson County Code, before the Board of Commissioners may
act on such a request, this matter requires “the advice and recommendation” of
the Henderson County Planning Board.
Under section 200-33.F(3), “[t]he Board of Commissioners shall not issue
a special use permit until it has received recommendations from the Planning
Board. If no action is taken by the Planning Board within 45 days of the
meeting at which the Planning Board first considers the development plan, it
shall be deemed to have recommended approval of the development plan, and the
Board of Commissioners may proceed to act upon the application.”
If the Board is so
inclined, the following motion was suggested:
I move that the application for a special use permit for
a planned unit development by Kasey-Phillips
Development,
LLC for “Vistas at Champion Hills” be forwarded to the Henderson County
Planning Board, pursuant to section 200-33 of the Henderson County Code.
Request from American Red Cross to
By letter dated
Staff recommended
approval of the request.
Non-Profit Performance Agreements
Subsequent to the
approval of the FY 2006-07 Budget, staff had distributed the funding agreements
to the non-profit agencies receiving County allocations. Staff will be including signed funding
agreements on the Board’s consent agendas as they are received from the
agencies.
Staff recommended that
the Board authorize the Chairman to execute the distributed funding agreements
and, in doing so, authorize the release of the first of the aforementioned
agencies’ quarterly allotments.
2006 Human Services Needs Assessment
Included in the agenda
packet for the Board’s review was a copy of the 2006 Human Services Needs
Assessment as prepared by the
Staff recommended that
the Board of Commissioners support the Alliance for Human Services’ efforts by
1) requesting that the Alliance bring back specific recommendations for
addressing the findings within the Needs Assessment for the Board of
Commissioner’s review, and 2) the Alliance participate in the County’s
2007-2011 Strategic Planning process by having input during the scheduled
listening sessions or through the completion of the e-survey.
Expansion of Fire Insurance Districts to Six Miles
The North Carolina
Department of Insurance has approved
The
RESOLUTION
Upon motion by Commissioner Chuck McGrady
BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Commissioners of Henderson County approve the
boundary lines of the Bat Cave, Blue Ridge, Dana, Edneyville, Etowah-Horse
Shoe, Fletcher, Gerton, Green River, Mills River, Mountain Home, Raven Rock
(Saluda), and Valley Hill Fire Insurance Districts for insurance grading purposes
only, in accordance with the map filed this date with the Board of County
Commissioners and recorded in the minutes of the meeting. The boundaries of the above referenced fire
insurance districts are described in the Henderson County Land Records Office.
This
is to certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of excerpt from
the Minutes of the Board of County Commissioners of
Elizabeth W. Corn
Clerk to the Board
NOMINATIONS
Notification of Vacancies
The Board was notified
of the following vacancies which will appear on the next agenda for
nominations:
1.
Nominations
Chairman Moyer reminded
the Board of the following vacancies and opened the floor to nominations:
1.
Child Fatality
Prevention Team – 1 vac.
There were no
nominations at this time so this item was rolled to the next meeting.
2.
Environmental Advisory
Committee – Appointment of Chairman
Commissioner McGrady moved the reappointment of Bill Hiatt
as Chair of the Environmental Advisory Committee. There were no other
nominations. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
3.
There were no
nominations at this time so this item was rolled to the next meeting.
4.
Historic Preservation
Commission – 2 vac.
Chairman Moyer stated
that the Board had already appointed Judy Abrell and Babs Kuykendall but terms
need to be set for them. There are also
two more vacancies to fill. There are a
number of applications on file.
Commissioner McGrady
nominated Donna Wilson and Susan Sneeringer. There were no other nominations at
this time. Chairman Moyer moved that they
both be accepted by acclamation. All
voted in favor and the motion carried.
There are eight people
whose terms need set.
Chairman Moyer nominated
Judy Abrell for a three-year term, Susan Sneeringer for a two-year term, and
Babs Kuykendall and Don Wilson for one-year terms. Chairman Moyer made that in the form of a motion. All voted in favor
and the motion carried.
Commissioner McGrady made the motion to appoint the
following municipal nominees:
Dries
Jasma, Flat Rock; James Stockman, Laurel Park; and
All voted in favor and the motion carried.
Commissioner McGrady made the motion to designate the
following terms for the municipal appointees:
Dries Jasma three years
James
Stockman two years
Eugene
Avergon one year
All voted in favor and the motion carried.
Ms. Brantley informed
the Board that
5.
Juvenile Crime
Prevention Council – 4 vac.
There
were no nominations at this time so this item was rolled to the next meeting.
6.
Nursing/Adult Care Home
Community Advisory Committee – 3 vac.
There were no
nominations at this time so this item was rolled to the next meeting.
7.
Solid Waste Advisory Committee
– 1 vac.
Amy Brantley reminded
the Board that they had been looking for a waste hauler for this position for
several months. It doesn’t seem that
there is one forthcoming so the Chairman of that committee, Katie Breckheimer,
had contacted some of the people who have applications on file and she
recommended the appointment of James Hemphill to position # 7.
Commissioner McGrady nominated
Mr. Hemphill for this vacancy.
Chairman Moyer made the motion to accept Mr. Hemphill by
acclamation. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
8.
WCCA Board of Directors
– 1 vac.
There were no
nominations at this time so this item was rolled to the next meeting.
ALTERNATIVE REVENUE TASK FORCE
Amy Brantley listed the
applications received for the Alternative Revenue Task Force for the Board’s
consideration and further discussion:
Paula DeLorenzo, Steve
Dozier, Edward Fortaw, Ed Glenn, David Nichols, Carl Shaw, Philip Stanley, Paul
Taylor, Hall Waddell, and Candler Willis.
In addition, she had received a letter of interest from Philip Stanley.
This afternoon she received applications from Nick Pryor and Michael Fleming.
At one of the strategic input sessions yesterday they heard from Elizabeth
Armour who volunteered herself.
Chairman Moyer stated that the School Board submitted Ken Butcher as a nominee.
Commissioner McGrady had heard from former County Commissioner Renee Kumor,
indicating she would be willing to serve.
Commissioner Messer
nominated Michael Fleming and Nick Pryor.
Chairman Moyer requested
that someone from staff type up all these names so that the Board could see
them all together and then they would vote on them later in the meeting (when
the list is ready).
Commissioner arrival
Commissioner Baldwin
arrived at this point in the meeting.
UPDATE ON PHASE II NPDES STORM WATER PROGRAM
Gary Tweed informed the
Board that there have been two developments in recent weeks concerning the
Phase II NPDES Storm Water Program.
The first deals with
interpretations by the Division of Water Quality, DWQ, concerning Henderson
County Facilities. During February 2003,
the County submitted to the N.C. Division of Water Quality the Certification
(attachment page 1) that the County does not own or operate any Municipal Storm
Water Systems (MS4’s). This was based on the fact that the County does not own
roads, and those instructions, given by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) at
that time, that individual site storm sewer systems would not be covered under
the Phase II NPDES Storm Water Program.
On
In review of the
regulation (attachment page 4), our interpretation of the rule is that
individual sites are not defined as a MS4 and would not be regulated under the
rule and would not require an NPDES Permit.
Staff is in the process of responding to the DWQ letter.
The second development
is that legislation has been introduced that would require the State to enforce
the Phase II requirements not only on the Urbanized Area, (see attachments page
5), but throughout the entire unincorporated areas of the County. Paul Meyer, Attorney for the County
Commissioners Association, had provided information by e-mail (see attachment
page 6) that outlines the new legislation.
As result of this
legislation, the State would be enforcing the Phase II NPDES Permit
requirements throughout the unincorporated areas of the County.
Following much
discussion, Chairman Moyer made the
motion that the Board go to NCACC (North Carolina Association of County
Commissioners) and try to get support from them and the other counties on this
issue and that the Board take this up again to see what kind of support there
will be for doing this before the Board decides to take this on as a battle. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
CONTINUATION OF NOMINATIONS – ALTERNATIVE
REVENUE TASK FORCE
Justin Hembree had
prepared a list of the persons interested in serving on the Alternative Revenue
Task Force.
Chairman Moyer stated
that the Board had agreed that we need very broad representation on this Task
Force. Steve Wyatt had recommended about nine members for the Task Force.
It was the consensus of
the Board to go ahead with a vote. The names on the list were: Paula DeLorenzo,
Steve Dozier, Edward Fortaw, Ed Glenn, David Nichols, Carl Shaw, Phillip Stanley,
Paul Taylor, Hall Waddell, Candler Willis, Elizabeth Armour, Ken Butcher,
Michael Fleming, and Nick Pryor.
The Clerk was asked to
poll the Board. The results were as follows with each Commissioner getting nine
votes:
Commissioner Shannon
Baldwin – DeLorenzo, Dozier, Glenn, Shaw, Stanley, Willis, Armour, Butcher,
Pryor.
Commissioner Chuck
McGrady – DeLorenzo, Dozier, Nichols, Shaw, Waddell, Armour, Butcher, Fleming,
Pryor.
Chairman Bill Moyer –
DeLorenzo, Dozier, Fortaw, Nichols, Shaw, Armour, Butcher, Fleming, Pryor.
Commissioner Charlie
Messer – DeLorenzo, Dozier, Glenn, Shaw, Stanley, Waddell, Armour, Fleming,
Pryor.
Commissioner Larry Young
– Dozier, Glenn, Stanley, Taylor, Waddell, Willis, Butcher, Fleming, Pryor.
The Clerk will tally the
votes for later in the meeting.
HISTORIC COURTHOUSE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION
Steve Wyatt stated that
the Historic Courthouse Project is underway.
The topic of construction administration for this project was placed on
the agenda for discussion.
After the last Board
meeting where we had representatives from Construction Control present, the
company that does comprehensive construction management throughout the
southeast, he took the opportunity to invite them to come sit down with staff
and see about what kind of expertise they could bring to the project and
determine interest. They came and met
with Steve, Gary Tweed, and Justin Hembree.
They went through the building.
Steve has had some subsequent phone call conversations with them. They are preparing to make a proposal. They are interested in the project. They have recommended informally at this
time, based on their inspection of the project, bringing somebody on full time
to be involved in construction management on the project. They would also have a couple of other
individuals that would be involved in oversight as different areas (mechanical,
electrical, HVAC) progress, they have different specialists in their company
that deal with these different issues.
He feels that the Company is very capable and provides a great deal of
back up with their capabilities further than just the person they would have on
site. Their construction manager has experience in doing rehabilitation on
historical buildings for re-use and government re-use, specifically a 1904
school in
Mr. Wyatt stated that he
is awaiting a proposal and feels that the proposed cost will be in the $8,500
per month range and we’re anticipating a 16 month project time. It would be based on one month notice
cancellation. It is not critical that we act on this now; however, there are
funds available and actually funds ear-marked in the project for a construction
manager/construction supervisor. He feels
that this company brings a lot more capability than we could bring if we were
hiring an individual person.
Following discussion, it was the consensus of the Board for Mr. Wyatt to
proceed with negotiations with the company and to bring back the scope of work
and the price (details) to the Board for approval and possibly even have the
person in attendance at the mid-month meeting.
Chairman Moyer stated
that the Board is talking to the School System about using these people on the
CONTINUATION OF ALTERNATIVE REVENUE TASK FORCE
The Clerk called out the
names of those persons (seven) who received four votes or more:
Paula DeLorenzo
Steve Dozier
Carl Shaw
Elizabeth Armour
Ken Butcher
Michael Fleming
Nick Pryor
She informed the Board
that there were three persons who received three votes, (Ed Glenn, Phillip
Stanley, and Hall Waddell) add three to the seven above and you have ten
appointed to the Task Force, or you have a run off of the three. The majority
of the Board agreed to go with ten appointees, all who received three votes and
above.
Steve Wyatt stated that
staff would endeavor to establish an organizational meeting with this group
within the next couple of weeks to begin business and will report to the Board
on a regular basis.
There was some
discussion of appointing the Chair of this Task Force.
Commissioner Baldwin
nominated Ken Butcher as Chair.
Commissioner Young
nominated Nick Pryor.
Commissioner Messer
nominated Steve Dozier.
Commissioner McGrady nominated
Carl Shaw.
Chairman Moyer moved approving the four as possible chairs,
wait until after the first meeting and see if these people are interested in
being Chair before voting for the Chair. A vote will be taken at the next
meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
UPDATE ON PENDING ISSUES
Land Development Code
Tedd Pearce, Chair of
the Planning Board, addressed the Board, stating that the Land Development Code
is progressing at a fairly good pace.
The Land Development Subcommittee is meeting weekly and the full
Planning Board is meeting every other week. The full Planning Board has not
approved any sections yet. They intend to keep this schedule up until they’re
done. Mr. Pearce stated that the Sept. 1 date is not achievable. Mr. Pearce will again update the Board at the
next meeting. He stated that just
because he says they won’t be done by September 1, it doesn’t mean they will
slow down their meeting schedule or anything of that nature. The full Planning Board is committed to stay
at this rate, working on it until the task is completed. The Planning Board,
like the Board of Commissioners, wants an instrument that they feel represents
the best possible effort that they could make. They are getting all the help
and support they need. They want to make sure that what they present is as good
an instrument as they can possibly produce.
Chairman Moyer asked Mr.
Pearce to relay to the Planning Board the Commissioners appreciation for the
extra work that they are accomplishing.
Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance
Russ Burrell skipped
right to the bottom line, how does the Board want staff to proceed? Do they want Anthony to go forward and go out
for a request for proposal and come back to the Board with proposals of what
would be needed to move forward with drafting an adequate public facilities
ordinance for
Anthony Starr briefed
the Board on what an adequate public facilities ordinance is. What is an APFO,
what can it do, what can it not do, what counties have it, how does it work,
who should we have participate in the development of an APFO, what are the
major components, what are the issues, what process should we follow??? Anthony Starr explained that those are some
of the questions that will have to be answered.
What is an APFO? It’s a
form of a land use regulation that controls the timing of property development
and population growth for the purpose of ensuring that public facilities needed
to serve new residents are constructed and made available with the impact of
the new development. Mr. Starr stated
that another way to say that is that the purpose of an APFO is to the maximum
extent practical approval of new residential development will become effective
only when it can reasonably be expected that adequate public facilities would
be available to accommodate that development. It’s a planning tool that
attempts to coordinate the capital improvement plan of the county and growth.
An adequate public facilities ordinance can apply to things such as schools,
jails, transportation, utilities, parks and recreation but most often and
particularly in
What it can do. It can help prevent school overcrowding. It can channel growth into certain geographic
areas that are more capable of handling new development. It can provide more certainty in our
financial forecast and budgeting process as we know what is going to be
happening with development, based on the facilities we have. It can eliminate periods of excessively high
growth and it can contribute to better capital planning.
What it cannot do. It is
not a mechanism to stop residential growth and it is in of itself not intended nor
will it provide the major source of funding for school construction. It will provide some significant revenues but
won’t be the sole source. Experience
tells us that from the other jurisdictions who have done that. They are largely untested in
How does it work? How
one could work is that proposed residential developments would have to get an
adequacy permit before they could develop.
The adequacy permit is determined by comparing the existing and expected
capacity at the schools in the area that the development would occur with the
number of approved lots. When a
residential development is denied an adequacy permit, it is placed in hold
until the school capacity would be available.
In other words, they wouldn’t be allowed to proceed. As an alternative
the county could allow the developer to proceed with their project even though
school capacity doesn’t exist by making a voluntary contribution. The Board would set the rate of that
contribution on a per lot basis. These
pre-established contributions would be used to accelerate the construction of
the school items that are on our capital improvement plan. You must have a strong capital improvement
plan and we are in the process of developing that. Mr. Starr thinks that will be a key component
of this, if the Board wishes to proceed down this road.
There are some
stakeholders, obviously the county government, the schools, and municipalities.
Quite a bit of the development that occurs, occurs within municipal
jurisdictions and if it only applies outside the municipalities and they’re not
cooperating then we’re really not going to address the issue of school capacity
or other capacities because it will channel the development to them but it
won’t address our problem completely. Homebuilders, developers, and of course
the citizens would be important. The
schools are the key people that would need to participate. In order to do that we’d have to have
something like a memorandum of understanding among the critical participants
like the schools and the municipalities and then you have other major
components – CIP, financial forecast. We
have those and we would just have to tie them in with everything. Cost of service analysis is one thing that we
don’t have in place now, an adequacy formula, school capacity and enrollment
projections, and then the actual ordinance itself. A consultant would be very helpful in
developing those issues.
The strategic plan
recommended that an adequate public facilities ordinance be developed. If the Board wishes to proceed, Mr. Starr
felt the next step would be to develop an RFP and define what the scope would
be and put that out to consultants for their consideration. Staff could bring that back to the Board for
how to proceed.
Following discussion, it
was the consensus of the Board to agree to staff proceeding with preparing the
RFP to get ready to send out. The Board was interested in looking at schools
primarily. The Board wants to see the RFP before it goes out.
Russell Burrell spoke
about HB 2047, an Act to Promote Consumer Choice in Video Services Providers
and to Establish Uniform Taxes for Video Programming Services. Basically this
is a bill that has passed that establishes state-wide franchises for video
service providers. John Crook had
informed Mr. Burrell that Mediacom intends to apply for this on the first
business day that they are able to do so,
Mr. Burrell also addressed
the franchise fee arrangements. There is
a floor that will be set under the county’s franchise fees that is based upon
the revenue received the first six months of fiscal year 2006-2007, so between
July and December of this year. That
will become forever the numerator of a number that comes with the total pool of
money available to be distributed to cities and counties in
He asked John Crook to
come forward to address this issue.
John Crook explained
that currently under the new agreement, the County would be able to qualify for
two channels and up to a maximum of seven channels. The requirement will be a minimum of eight
hours a day scheduled programming. Each
channel is limited to 15% of repeat programming, no more than 15% of the
programming can be character generated and all programming must be
non-commercial. After a matching county contribution of up to $25,000 a year then
the State will match that capital contribution up to $25,000 and there is also
a provision for another $25,000 per channel to a maximum of three channels in
operating funds potentially coming to the county/annually. The distribution on
the capital contribution will be handled through ENC, the distribution on the
$25,000 in operating funds would come from the Secretary of State.
Russell Burrell stated
that the programming must be non-commercial, a term that is not defined. “Does
that mean that it cannot be commercially produced? Does that mean it can’t have
the PBS logo. Those terms don’t appear anywhere in here. We’ll see how that is
ultimately defined in the regs. that are adopted underneath this some time
later by the State of
John Crook explained
that Flat Rock’s franchise agreement is the first one that would have expired
but they extended it for 12 months.
Their agreement now has been extended until mid June of 2007.
Russell Burrell
explained that Mediacom has in hand a draft of an agreement that he had just
proposed to them that will come back before the Board for approval which
basically holds things exactly as they are between now and whenever they get a franchise under the
State.
John Crook stated that
as of this past Friday, Mediacom provided checks to Laurel Park and to
Steve Wyatt informed the
Board that yesterday, County staff conducted 5.5 hrs. of public input session. He addressed the Board’s attention to the
large pieces of paper on the walls in the meeting room with lists of some of
the issues that were gathered. The
process will begin again tomorrow at
Steve Wyatt informed the
Board that today 47 employees earned certificates, those who survived the
budget boot camp. Bill Rivenbark from
the
IMPORTANT DATES
Set Public Hearing on Rezoning Application #R-2006-02
Rezoning Application
#R-2006-02, which was submitted on June 9, 2006, requested that the County
rezone approximately 5.91 acres of land, located off Greenville Highway (NC
#225), from an R-20 (Low-Density Residential) zoning district to an R-10
(High-Density Residential) zoning district.
The Subject Area appears to be parcel 9577-27-6882 which is owned by the
applicants, Michael L. and Tracy J. Burns. The Applicant’s Agent is Norma McMahan.
The Henderson County
Planning Board considered rezoning application #R-2006-02 at its regularly
scheduled meeting on
Before taking action on
the rezoning application, the Board of Commissioners must hold a public
hearing. Staff proposed that the hearing be scheduled for
The
Commissioner McGrady made the motion to set this public
hearing for Wednesday, September 20 at
The Human Services
Building Project is nearing completion.
Staff with the County’s human services agencies (DSS and Public Health)
will be moving into the building in late September. Operations in the new building will be
underway by early October. It would be
appropriate for the Board of Commissioners to schedule a Grand Opening
Celebration.
The
Commissioner McGrady made the motion to approve staff’s
recommendation to set the Grand Opening Celebration for 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday,
October 18, 2006. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
Annual Volunteer Appreciation Banquet
Staff requested that the
Board look at their calendars regarding the date for the 2006 Annual Volunteer
Appreciation Banquet. The banquet was
held last year at
It was the consensus of
the Board to schedule the Volunteer Appreciation Banquet at Highland Lake Inn
on Tuesday, October 24 in the evening.
CANE CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT
Commissioner McGrady made the motion that the Board adjourn
as the
Commissioner McGrady made the motion that the Board adjourn
as the Cane Creek Water and Sewer District and reconvene as the
CLOSED SESSION
Chairman Moyer made the motion for the Board to go into
Closed Session as allowed pursuant to NCGS 143-318.11 for the following reasons:
1.(a)(3) To
consult with an attorney employed or retained by the public body in order to
preserve
the attorney-client privilege between the attorney and the public body,
which
privilege is hereby acknowledged. To
consult with an attorney employed
or
retained by the pubic body in order to consider and give instructions to the
attorney
with respect to the following claim:
In
the Matter of the Appeal of Tyleta Morgan (NC PTC)
All voted in favor and the motion carried.
Attest:
Elizabeth W. Corn, Clerk to the Board William L. Moyer, Chairman